Allen Li writes:
> I have worked around this locally, but I hope we can revisit this later since
> it makes Org mode's user interface better.
I'm not totally convinced about that.
> Does it make sense for Org mode to keep a separate release branch so
> new features can be worked on while a
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 6:11 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Allen Li writes:
>
> > Okay, thanks. I guess we can see how this works out with respect to users
> > like Brent using org-tags-match-list-sublevels or otherwise using
> > hierarchy.
>
> On second thought, this may not be a
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> Okay, thanks. I guess we can see how this works out with respect to users
> like Brent using org-tags-match-list-sublevels or otherwise using
> hierarchy.
On second thought, this may not be a good idea, especially on master
branch, which is close from being released.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:18 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Allen Li writes:
>
> > Perhaps the stars should only be shown if
> > org-tags-match-list-sublevels is set to indented, so that the agenda
> > view matches
> > the column view with respect to showing hierarchy?
>
> I don't
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> Perhaps the stars should only be shown if
> org-tags-match-list-sublevels is set to indented, so that the agenda
> view matches
> the column view with respect to showing hierarchy?
I don't think it makes sense since the aforementioned variable is not
related to
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:36 AM Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>
> In my custom agenda view for Projects I set
> (org-tags-match-list-sublevels 'indented)
Good to know, although I see that setting
org-tags-match-list-sublevels to anything other than t is
semi-obsolete.
However, we are talking mostly
Allen Li writes:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:28 AM Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>> Allen Li writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Nicolas Goaziou
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is not satisfying, actually. If every item has a single asterisk,
>> >> you miss hierarchy between headlines in
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> Apparently I'm missing something. How are you using hierarchy in an
> agenda view? Agenda views are flat, e.g.:
>
> tasks: TODO [#A] Some task
> tasks: TODO [#A] Some task
> tasks: TODO [#A] Some task
> tasks: TODO Some task
> tasks:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 6:28 AM Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
> Allen Li writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Nicolas Goaziou
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> This is not satisfying, actually. If every item has a single asterisk,
> >> you miss hierarchy between headlines in the same tree.
> >
> > I
Allen Li writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Nicolas Goaziou
> wrote:
>>
>> This is not satisfying, actually. If every item has a single asterisk,
>> you miss hierarchy between headlines in the same tree.
>
> I don't know what you mean. Hierarchy is not displayed normally in
> agenda
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> This is not satisfying, actually. If every item has a single asterisk,
> you miss hierarchy between headlines in the same tree.
I don't know what you mean. Hierarchy is not displayed normally in
agenda view anyway, I don't know why
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:35 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> We could ignore the level when displaying ITEM in agenda column view. As
>> a consequence, every item would start with a single star, which is
>> shorter and still not confusing.
>
> Sounds good to me.
This is
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:35 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> We could ignore the level when displaying ITEM in agenda column view. As
> a consequence, every item would start with a single star, which is
> shorter and still not confusing.
Sounds good to me.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:14 AM Allen Li wrote:
>>
>> Or did you mean ITEM omits the stars? That doesn't appear to be the
>> case as of 04641c4bbefc5f90e05fe4e846f4aeab15f1c262 on master
>> yesterday.
>
> So org-entry-properties does indeed return ITEM without the
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> Or did you mean ITEM omits the stars?
Yes, I did.
> That doesn't appear to be the case as of
> 04641c4bbefc5f90e05fe4e846f4aeab15f1c262 on master yesterday.
Actually, that should be the case since Org 9.0.
Do you have an ECM?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:14 AM Allen Li wrote:
>
> Or did you mean ITEM omits the stars? That doesn't appear to be the
> case as of 04641c4bbefc5f90e05fe4e846f4aeab15f1c262 on master
> yesterday.
So org-entry-properties does indeed return ITEM without the leading
stars, but the column view adds
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:57 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Allen Li writes:
>
> > (I used org-submit-bug-report, but this is a feature request.)
> >
> > It would be nice to have a special property like ITEM
> > without the leading stars, which is annoying in, e.g., the agenda column
>
Hello,
Allen Li writes:
> (I used org-submit-bug-report, but this is a feature request.)
>
> It would be nice to have a special property like ITEM
> without the leading stars, which is annoying in, e.g., the agenda column
> view.
>
> I imagine that this will be easy to implement.
> There may be
(I used org-submit-bug-report, but this is a feature request.)
It would be nice to have a special property like ITEM
without the leading stars, which is annoying in, e.g., the agenda column
view.
I imagine that this will be easy to implement.
There may be some UI implications (confusing in some
19 matches
Mail list logo
