Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

> On May 30, 2018, at 4:11 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > Aaron Ecay writes: > >> Improved documentation is never a bad thing. OTOH, I personally would >> not spend time on implementing the mapping you propose. > > I simply added a footnote about C++ and D languages. > >>

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

Hello, Aaron Ecay writes: > Improved documentation is never a bad thing. OTOH, I personally would > not spend time on implementing the mapping you propose. I simply added a footnote about C++ and D languages. > org-babel-do-load-languages is IMO a relic. I think that all babel > languages

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

Hi Nicolas, 2018ko maiatzak 27an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: [...] > > We probably need to implement a mapping between languages symbols and > files and use it in `org-babel-do-load-languages'. The implicit mapping > it uses currently has shortcomings. > > We could also leave it like

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

Aaron Ecay writes: > Is this right? Even if the feature is provide-d by the file, the require > in org-babel-do-load-languages will not find it (because the file name > does not match). C++ is not a valid choice for the variable AFAICT. The > customize interface makes

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

Hi Nicolas, 2018ko maiatzak 27an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: [...] > No, that's not correct. It should be (C++ . t), but "ob-C.el" should > provide "ob-C++" feature, too. Is this right? Even if the feature is provide-d by the file, the require in org-babel-do-load-languages will not find

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

Hello, Van L writes: >> John Kitchin writes: >> >> It should be (C . t) >> >> it looks like ob-C also handles C++. > > How about the following to update the documentation: > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > diff --git a/doc/misc/org.texi b/doc/misc/org.texi > index cf1c037..7b00f0a

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

> John Kitchin writes: > > It should be (C . t) > > it looks like ob-C also handles C++. > Section 14.7 Languages in the Org Mode working with source code infopages > lists C++. Thanks. How about the following to update the documentation: #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE diff --git a/doc/misc/org.texi

Re: [O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

It should be (C . t) it looks like ob-C also handles C++. John --- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu On Sat,

[O] C++ is not accepted for SRC block evaluation

Hello. The `m-x customize’ path to `org-babel-load-languages’ or the following method won’t accept C++. #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :results none (org-babel-do-load-languages 'org-babel-load-languages '((C++ . t))) #+END_SRC The messages buffer has the following. executing Elisp code