Hello,
Michaël Cadilhac writes:
> Apologies for the delay.
>
> Is that alright?
It is. Applied. Thank you!
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Apologies for the delay.
Is that alright?
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 17:15, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Michaël Cadilhac writes:
>
> > Will do. This in particular requires to swap fontifying the drawers
> > and the keywords (since :END: and :PROPERTIES: are keywords):
>
> [...]
>
> > Agreed?
>
>
Michaël Cadilhac writes:
> Will do. This in particular requires to swap fontifying the drawers
> and the keywords (since :END: and :PROPERTIES: are keywords):
[...]
> Agreed?
Sure. Please do what is necessary ;)
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 16:11, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Would you want to provide a patch including the replacement of
> `org-special-keyword' with `org-drawer'?
Will do. This in particular requires to swap fontifying the drawers
and the keywords (since :END: and :PROPERTIES: are keywords):
Hello,
Michaël Cadilhac writes:
> I agree; following your advice, I took the simpler path of customizing
> org-special-keyword. By changing its height, I got a small glitch;
> consider:
> https://michael.cadilhac.name/public/org-props-small-1.png
> The lines with ":PROPERTIES:" did not
Hi there;
Again, thanks for your help Nicolas—that's much appreciated.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 15:55, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> The face you use for drawers is, well obnoxious, to say the least. No
> wonder you find them cluttering your display.
I agree; following your advice, I took the simpler
> More generally, I feel uneasy about completely hiding stuff. Org format
> is not meant to be opaque. I think the current situation is fine, as far
> as /core/ Org is concerned. Of course, users are free to extend it to
> their own needs.
Yes, indeed.
Occasionally I use
#v+
#+begin_src elisp
Michaël Cadilhac writes:
> You mention that these drawers don't clutter display, so as an
> example, consider the following screenshot:
> https://michael.cadilhac.name/public/org-props.png
The face you use for drawers is, well obnoxious, to say the least. No
wonder you find them cluttering
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 14:32, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Since properties drawers are almost exclusively folded, I don't think
> incriminated properties clutter display. Besides, I don't think any
> property is irrelevant to every user. How would we know?
I'd have a customizable list of
Hello,
Michaël Cadilhac writes:
> Agreed, hiding properties entirely seems overkill and quite limited in
> use cases. However, I think this stems from a more general need to
> hide properties that are irrelevant to the user—for instance, UIDs
> created by ox-icalendar, or other internal
Hi there;
Agreed, hiding properties entirely seems overkill and quite limited in
use cases. However, I think this stems from a more general need to
hide properties that are irrelevant to the user—for instance, UIDs
created by ox-icalendar, or other internal properties. As a user, I
see no need
Hello,
Keith David Bershatsky writes:
> A few years ago, I wrote up an answer to my own question on
> Stackoverflow to completely hide the :PROPERTIES: drawer, including
> the line that says :PROPERTIES:. Since then, it has received nearly
> 5,000 views, 11 stars, 17 upvotes on the initial
A few years ago, I wrote up an answer to my own question on Stackoverflow to
completely hide the :PROPERTIES: drawer, including the line that says
:PROPERTIES:. Since then, it has received nearly 5,000 views, 11 stars, 17
upvotes on the initial question, and 15 upvotes on the answer.
Today, a
13 matches
Mail list logo
