Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-20 Thread John Hendy
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Hi John, John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes: Thanks for the clarification, though regardless of the current state... what is the consensus on what it *should* be? The old lingo was: - #+attr_latex: width=Xcm - #+attr_html:

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-19 Thread John Hendy
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote: Hi again, 2013ko martxoak 19an, Aaron Ecay-ek idatzi zuen: I’m sorry, that was a mistake. I sent a patch to the HTML backend to enable this behavior, but forgot all about it. Then when I checked the code, it looked

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-19 Thread Bastien
Hi John, John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes: Thanks for the clarification, though regardless of the current state... what is the consensus on what it *should* be? The old lingo was: - #+attr_latex: width=Xcm - #+attr_html: width=Xpx ... and the new lingo is #+attr_latex: :width Xcm

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-19 Thread Bastien
Hi John, John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes: I also tried =:width 5cm= for images. Despite this being options and sounding like it needs to be in the :options string instead of :width, it still works but quoted parts still get quotes =[width=5cm]= in the resultant .tex file. If I remove

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-18 Thread Aaron Ecay
Hi John, 2013ko martxoak 17an, John Hendy-ek idatzi zuen: #+begin_quote Aaron Ecay Eliminating subtleties is precisely the point of this change. All(-ish)* backends now use :width. * As far as I’ve checked, HTML(+ derived backends) and LaTeX(+derived backends). If there are any that

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-18 Thread Aaron Ecay
Hi again, 2013ko martxoak 19an, Aaron Ecay-ek idatzi zuen: I’m sorry, that was a mistake. I sent a patch to the HTML backend to enable this behavior, but forgot all about it. Then when I checked the code, it looked like the functionality was already there! I’ll follow up with Bastien about

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-17 Thread John Hendy
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:57 PM, John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com wrote: Just making the transition to the new exporter, finally, today. Just some notes regarding the documentation that I wanted to pass along. I think there's some possibly conflicting information (or at least ambiguous) out

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-17 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Hi John, John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes: Am I doing something wrong if this is the behavior I'm getting, or is the documentation incorrect and I shouldn't be quoting these options? Nicolas cleaned up the attribute syntax recently. Previously, quotes were needed and backslashes were

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-17 Thread John Hendy
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote: Hi John, John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes: Am I doing something wrong if this is the behavior I'm getting, or is the documentation incorrect and I shouldn't be quoting these options? Nicolas cleaned up the attribute

Re: [O] Confusion about attr_latex and new exporter

2013-03-17 Thread Thomas S. Dye
John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes: Thanks, Tom. Having an issue, though. From what I've read/heard... =:width= is used for all backends now? This seems to be indicated by this pretty recent post as well: - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68306 #+begin_quote Aaron Ecay