Aldric Giacomoni writes:
> Understood, thank you very much for explaining it :)
Well - you could define it as one huge table, where the first x columns
belong to the first table, and the last x belong to the second table -
but using this table as an input for further calculations might be
tricky
Understood, thank you very much for explaining it :)
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo <
jorge.a.alf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
> > In Org-mode that would be (at least) very strange, but Org-mode uses
> > backends for the final docs, so you might want
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> In Org-mode that would be (at least) very strange, but Org-mode uses
> backends for the final docs, so you might want to look at e.g. LaTeX
> multi-column styles and if Org-mode supports them somehow. But even if
> so, it might get complicated and using AucTex directly m
Aldric Giacomoni writes:
> I did -want- to do that.
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Omid wrote:
>
> Then I misunderstood you. I thought you wanted to create tables
> side by sides.
In Org-mode that would be (at least) very strange, but Org-mode uses
backends for the final docs, so y
I did -want- to do that.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Omid wrote:
> Then I misunderstood you. I thought you wanted to create tables side
> by sides. This of course allows you to look at different parts of your
> buffer side by side, with the additional features I mentioned.
>
> On 06/05/2014
Then I misunderstood you. I thought you wanted to create tables side
by sides. This of course allows you to look at different parts of your
buffer side by side, with the additional features I mentioned.
On 06/05/2014 03:54 PM, Aldric Giacomoni wrote:
> Omid: The idea is C-x 3, clone-indirect-buffe
Omid: The idea is C-x 3, clone-indirect-buffer, so I can see and modify the
same buffer in two different places. So.. A workaround, not a solution.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Omid wrote:
>
> With clone-indirect-buffer you'll get a twin copy of your original
> buffer. You are in effect edit
With clone-indirect-buffer you'll get a twin copy of your original
buffer. You are in effect editing the same buffer in two different ,
with some additional niceties like having separate modes and
narrow-to-region, etc (see an example usage at
http://demonastery.org/2013/04/emacs-narrow-to-region-
Aldric Giacomoni writes:
> I'd like to be able to create multiple tables on the same rows, like
> such:
>
> | Group | Name | | Something | Else |
> |--+--| |-+- --|
> | 1 | foo | | Yes | No |
> |--+--| |-+---|
>
> This might
I'd like to be able to create multiple tables on the same rows, like such:
| Group | Name | | Something | Else |
|--+--| |-+- --|
|1 | foo | | Yes | No |
|--+--| |-+---|
This might be
10 matches
Mail list logo
