Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hello, Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Thank you. Some minor comments below. Feel free to push whenever you >> think this is good enough. > > OK, I pushed the patch. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Thank you. Some minor comments below. Feel free to push whenever you > think this is good enough. OK, I pushed the patch. >> +(defconst org-html-plain-list-type >> + '(ordered "ol" unordered "ul" descriptive "dl") >> + "Plist of Org and

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hello, Rasmus writes: > Here's a quick attempt. Do you want me to push it? Thank you. Some minor comments below. Feel free to push whenever you think this is good enough. > +(defconst org-html-plain-list-type > + '(ordered "ol" unordered "ul" descriptive "dl") > + "Plist of

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rasmus writes: > >> IOW the problems are all fairly easy to deal with once we've added :style >> and :class support to more places in ox-html. > > Great. Would you, or anyone else, be interested in working on this?

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hello, Rasmus writes: > IOW the problems are all fairly easy to deal with once we've added :style > and :class support to more places in ox-html. Great. Would you, or anyone else, be interested in working on this? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hi, > #+attr_html: some clever code which I don't know. Probably `org-html-begin-plain-list' would need to patched to accept :class or :style. In general it might be nicer to accept those in more places. Then one could do either "#+attr_html: :class alpha" (with corresponding css) or

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On Saturday, 11 Feb 2017 at 01:20, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > Again, I'm sure it is useful for some documents, but I don't think Org > should provide such WYSIWYG feature. Just to let you know that I completely support this statement. If people want a word processor, there are plenty about

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hello, Titus von der Malsburg writes: > On 2017-02-09 Thu 09:29, Rasmus wrote: >> Titus von der Malsburg writes: >> >>> That’s a neat hack that might come in handy at some point. However, it >>> changes the bullet point to letters for /all/ ordered

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On 2017-02-09 Thu 09:29, Rasmus wrote: > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> That’s a neat hack that might come in handy at some point. However, it >> changes the bullet point to letters for /all/ ordered lists in the >> document, not just for those that use letters in the

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Titus von der Malsburg writes: > That’s a neat hack that might come in handy at some point. However, it > changes the bullet point to letters for /all/ ordered lists in the > document, not just for those that use letters in the org source. Yes, I use the simplest possible

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On 2017-02-06 Mon 15:34, Rasmus wrote: > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> On 2017-02-03 Fri 12:40, Eric S Fraga wrote: >>> On Friday, 3 Feb 2017 at 11:37, Titus von der Malsburg wrote: >>> >> >>> [...] >>> For me and many others, this is a very common use case. I

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Titus von der Malsburg writes: > On 2017-02-03 Fri 12:40, Eric S Fraga wrote: >> On Friday, 3 Feb 2017 at 11:37, Titus von der Malsburg wrote: >> > >> [...] >> >>> For me and many others, this is a very common use case. I challenge you >>> to implement this with current Org

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On 3 February 2017, Rainer M Krug wrote: I must admit, I haven't read the thread mentioned, and I am sure Carsten's point was correct, but orgmode is more and more used for non-structure tasks. As an example I see the whole field of reproductive research and scientific paper writing, which, in

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On 2017-02-03 Fri 12:40, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Friday, 3 Feb 2017 at 11:37, Titus von der Malsburg wrote: > > [...] > >> For me and many others, this is a very common use case. I challenge you >> to implement this with current Org such that it will export correctly to >> HTML and PDF. If

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On Friday, 3 Feb 2017 at 11:37, Titus von der Malsburg wrote: [...] > For me and many others, this is a very common use case. I challenge you > to implement this with current Org such that it will export correctly to > HTML and PDF. If I’m not mistaken, this is non-trivial. If there is no

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Titus von der Malsburg writes: >> >>> Correct me if I’m wrong but there are a lot of things in Org that are >>> just about typesetting: *bold*, /italic/, _underlined_, =verbatim= and >>> ~code~, +strike-through+. Would you remove these things as well?

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> One issue with org-list-allow-alphabetical is that we get numbers >> instead of letters when we export to HTML and LaTeX. I saw the earlier >> thread [0] that gives the

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> Correct me if I’m wrong but there are a lot of things in Org that are >> just about typesetting: *bold*, /italic/, _underlined_, =verbatim= and >> ~code~, +strike-through+. Would you

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Titus von der Malsburg writes: > Correct me if I’m wrong but there are a lot of things in Org that are > just about typesetting: *bold*, /italic/, _underlined_, =verbatim= and > ~code~, +strike-through+. Would you remove these things as well? I could argue that emphasis is

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On 2017-02-02 Thu 19:57, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> One issue with org-list-allow-alphabetical is that we get numbers >> instead of letters when we export to HTML and LaTeX. I saw the earlier >> thread [0] that gives the reasoning

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hello, Titus von der Malsburg writes: > One issue with org-list-allow-alphabetical is that we get numbers > instead of letters when we export to HTML and LaTeX. I saw the earlier > thread [0] that gives the reasoning for this but I find it > unsatisfying. If Org allows us

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

On 2017-02-02 Thu 17:55, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Titus von der Malsburg writes: > >> Items in lists can start with -, +, N), or N. (with N being an >> integer). It’s currently not possible, to use letters as in the >> following examples: >> >> a. First item >> b.

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

Hello, Titus von der Malsburg writes: > Items in lists can start with -, +, N), or N. (with N being an > integer). It’s currently not possible, to use letters as in the > following examples: > > a. First item > b. Second item > > or > > a) First item > b) Second item > > I

[O] Feature request: lists with letters

Items in lists can start with -, +, N), or N. (with N being an integer). It’s currently not possible, to use letters as in the following examples: a. First item b. Second item or a) First item b) Second item I believe it would make sense to allow letters in org-mode because that’s a very