Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-25 Thread Daniel Borchmann
ghItlhpu' Daimrod daim...@gmail.com: My question is now: is this correct, or did I understand something wrong? If my understanding is correct, how this bug be fixed more elegantly? It doesn't work at startup when agenda hasn't been built yet. The following patch does seem to fix that. If

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-24 Thread Daimrod
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes: Daimrod daim...@gmail.com writes: Here is an updated version of the second patch : Both look good. Could you can push them. Thank you. Done, thank you. Regards, -- Daimrod/Greg signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-23 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Daimrod daim...@gmail.com writes: Here is an updated version of the second patch : Both look good. Could you can push them. Thank you. Regards,

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-23 Thread Daimrod
Err, I should have tested it before sending the patch, sorry. Here is an updated version of the second patch : From 11ef3cc8dd804a9498edc856350d5e57d9ce3fff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Gr=C3=A9goire=20Jadi?= gregoire.j...@univ-nantes.fr Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:42:25 +0200 Subject:

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-23 Thread Daimrod
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes: What happened to the effort filter? Good catch! Thanks. Here is an updated patch plus another one to fix the regexp and category filters. From 59cd3eb256d9473db42f9a1629755140c0d648cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Gr=C3=A9goire=20Jadi?=

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-22 Thread Subhan Michael Tindall
after reviving buried, sticky agenda Daniel Borchmann daniel.borchm...@tu-dresden.de writes: ghItlhpu' Daimrod daim...@gmail.com: My question is now: is this correct, or did I understand something wrong? If my understanding is correct, how this bug be fixed more elegantly? It doesn't

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-22 Thread Nick Dokos
Daimrod daim...@gmail.com writes: It doesn't work at startup when agenda hasn't been built yet. The following patch does seem to fix that. If it's ok, I can push it. From d2e8fef81585c249f33fa37260f6228709a67017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Gr=C3=A9goire=20Jadi?=

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-21 Thread Daimrod
Daniel Borchmann daniel.borchm...@tu-dresden.de writes: Dear all, I regularly lose all my filters when I bury a sticky agenda and revive it later. In that case, the variable `org-agenda-tag-filter' is set to nil, although it was non-nil before burying. I played around a bit, and found out

Re: [O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-06-21 Thread Daimrod
Daniel Borchmann daniel.borchm...@tu-dresden.de writes: ghItlhpu' Daimrod daim...@gmail.com: My question is now: is this correct, or did I understand something wrong? If my understanding is correct, how this bug be fixed more elegantly? It doesn't work at startup when agenda hasn't been

[O] Filters lost after reviving buried, sticky agenda

2015-05-01 Thread Daniel Borchmann
Dear all, I regularly lose all my filters when I bury a sticky agenda and revive it later. In that case, the variable `org-agenda-tag-filter' is set to nil, although it was non-nil before burying. I played around a bit, and found out that `org-agenda-tag-filter' is buffer-local (which is not a