Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-11 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Tuesday, 10 Jan 2017 at 13:12, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: > Yes, I tested all my header lines and found that was the 'offender." > It got there on someone's suggestion it was needed for proper TikZ. Or > was it bibtex? Or does a ton of pngs come if you choose Latex preview? > No time for further

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-10 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Yes, I tested all my header lines and found that was the 'offender." It got there on someone's suggestion it was needed for proper TikZ. Or was it bibtex? Or does a ton of pngs come if you choose Latex preview? No time for further investigation. Confusion will be my epitaph. . . . On Tue, Jan 10,

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-10 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Tuesday, 10 Jan 2017 at 00:13, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: > This is the entirety of my header section. I'm sure there are > redundancies etc. But again, the clean vanilla of Emacs 25.1.1 and > org-mode 9.0.2 is defaulting to producing png's. [...] > #+OPTIONS: tex:imagemagick Maybe this is the

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
org-html-with-latex is t and org-export-with-latex is also t. I don't have a org-html-format-latex, or at least nothing comes up with C-h v org-html-format-latex. Also, how does edebug work as you, Nick, described? On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Lawrence Bottorff wrote: >

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
This is the entirety of my header section. I'm sure there are redundancies etc. But again, the clean vanilla of Emacs 25.1.1 and org-mode 9.0.2 is defaulting to producing png's. #+TITLE: \zwnj^{147}Pm SAGA #+AUTHOR: 147Pm #+EMAIL: borg...@sdf.org # date ... will set (change) each time (if

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Nick Dokos
Lawrence Bottorff writes: > The default behavior with a plain vanilla installation is, indeed, to use png > files and create the > ltximg subdirectory. It's not a huge problem, but I'd prefer it not doing > that; instead, using MathJax. > Anyone know how to switch this

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Thierry Banel
Le 09/01/2017 16:28, Lawrence Bottorff a écrit : I've got an org file with Latex math markup, e.g. $x_2/y^3$. When I export this to HTML, it produces png files for each markup and puts them in a subfolder ltximg. Is there any way to skip

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
The default behavior with a plain vanilla installation is, indeed, to use png files and create the ltximg subdirectory. It's not a huge problem, but I'd prefer it not doing that; instead, using MathJax. Anyone know how to switch this behavior? On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Nick Dokos

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Lawrence Bottorff writes: > I've got an org file with Latex math markup, e.g. $x_2/y^3$. When I export > this to HTML, it produces png files for each markup and puts them in a > subfolder ltximg. Is there any way to skip this translating to pictures and > just use

Re: [O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Nick Dokos
Lawrence Bottorff writes: > I've got an org file with Latex math markup, e.g. $x_2/y^3$. When I export > this to HTML, it produces png > files for each markup and puts them in a subfolder ltximg. Is there any way > to skip this translating to > pictures and just use MathJax

[O] HTML export for math markup

2017-01-09 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
I've got an org file with Latex math markup, e.g. $x_2/y^3$. When I export this to HTML, it produces png files for each markup and puts them in a subfolder ltximg. Is there any way to skip this translating to pictures and just use MathJax directly. I've seen this