* Thierry Banel wrote:
> Le 28/12/2016 16:42, Karl Voit a écrit :
>> Hi!
>>
>> I wonder how others are handling synchronization ignore patterns
>> between different hosts.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Currently, I am evaluating Syncthing[0] which looks very good so
>> far. It is a
Le 28/12/2016 16:42, Karl Voit a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I wonder how others are handling synchronization ignore patterns
> between different hosts.
>
> ...
>
> Currently, I am evaluating Syncthing[0] which looks very good so
> far. It is a game-changer to be because similar to Dropbox[1], it
>
Hi Skip,
* Skip Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Karl Voit wrote:
>> I wonder how others are handling synchronization ignore patterns
>> between different hosts.
>
> Perhaps you should consider git annex. It is extremely flexible
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Karl Voit wrote:
> I wonder how others are handling synchronization ignore patterns
> between different hosts.
Perhaps you should consider git annex. It is extremely flexible about
choosing which file to sync. It works cross-platform and is
Hi!
I wonder how others are handling synchronization ignore patterns
between different hosts.
In particular, I do have "issues" with temporary files of Emacs +
Org-mode like «.#myfile.org» or «#myfile.org#».
The first one is a symlink which does not bother me as long as I
keep quitting my