Hi John,
this is really nice! Thanks for sharing.
- Andreas
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
check out this implementation for tables:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2014/03/01/Getting-a-list-of-tables-in-an-org-buffer/
John
---
John
No problem. I worked out a List of figures here:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2014/03/02/Getting-a-list-of-figures-in-an-org-buffer/
John
---
John Kitchin
Associate Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon
check out this implementation for tables:
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2014/03/01/Getting-a-list-of-tables-in-an-org-buffer/
John
---
John Kitchin
Associate Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Maybe I am missing something, what would the utility of #+toc: figures be?
Is it only for export?
I would make a link: [[elisp:org-list-of-figures]] where
org-list-of-figures is an emacs-lisp function that would parse the buffer
and present you
Maybe I am missing something, what would the utility of #+toc: figures be?
Is it only for export?
I would make a link: [[elisp:org-list-of-figures]] where
org-list-of-figures is an emacs-lisp function that would parse the buffer
and present you with a list of clickable links to the figures. You
Aloha John,
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Maybe I am missing something, what would the utility of #+toc: figures be?
Is it only for export?
Yes, it is.
I would make a link: [[elisp:org-list-of-figures]] where
org-list-of-figures is an emacs-lisp function that would parse
Hello,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
I can imagine that a list of figures is a difficult problem in some
other back-ends. However, its absence in LaTeX export seems unusual.
Org doesn't cover all LaTeX facilities. There are #+LATEX:
and #+BEGIN_LATEX...#+END_LATEX to fill the gap.
Aloha Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
I can imagine that a list of figures is a difficult problem in some
other back-ends. However, its absence in LaTeX export seems unusual.
Org doesn't cover all LaTeX facilities. There
Hello,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
I'm trying to generate a list of figures for LaTeX export. I thought to
use #+TOC: figures, but this didn't work.
The Org Export Reference Documentation has this:
“TOC” keyword. It accepts three common values: “headlines”, “tables” and
Aloha Rasmus,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
1) Is there a reason that the TOC keyword doesn't accept the value
figures? The reference to org-export-collect-figures suggests that it
should accept this value.
AFAIK it is not supported. It has puzzled
Aloha Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
I'm trying to generate a list of figures for LaTeX export. I thought to
use #+TOC: figures, but this didn't work.
The Org Export Reference Documentation has this:
“TOC” keyword.
Aloha all,
I'm trying to generate a list of figures for LaTeX export. I thought to
use #+TOC: figures, but this didn't work.
The Org Export Reference Documentation has this:
“TOC” keyword. It accepts three common values: “headlines”, “tables” and
“listings”. Also, “headlines” value can
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
1) Is there a reason that the TOC keyword doesn't accept the value
figures? The reference to org-export-collect-figures suggests that it
should accept this value.
AFAIK it is not supported. It has puzzled me as well. It's trivial
to make a patch for
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Luke Crook l...@balooga.com writes:
I just noticed that the List of Figures is not being generated in 8.0.3.
I have a figure with;
#+LATEX: \listoffigures
#+ATTR_LaTeX: width=5.5cm
Maybe try with
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
It used to be that the naming was mandatory: the intervening #+caption
line would cause babel to produce a new results block. ISTR that Nicolas
fixed it so that the naming is no longer necessary and babel will DTRT -
IOW, the following will work:
,
|
Thanks for highlighting this. Being able to skip the #+NAME tag in this
situation makes it quite straightforward.
Luke Crook l...@balooga.com writes:
I just noticed that the List of Figures is not being generated in 8.0.3.
I have a figure with;
#+LATEX: \listoffigures
#+ATTR_LaTeX: width=5.5cm
Maybe try with
#+attr_latex: :width 5.5cm
The format for attributes has changed in version 8 of org.
--
:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Luke Crook l...@balooga.com writes:
I just noticed that the List of Figures is not being generated in 8.0.3.
I have a figure with;
#+LATEX: \listoffigures
#+ATTR_LaTeX: width=5.5cm
Maybe try with
#+attr_latex: :width 5.5cm
The format for
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
Hi Luke!
It seems you're using v8.0.3. . .
Thank you for the feedback. I should have scrubbed my tags pre-8.0 tags to
conform to the post-8.0 world, sorry about that.
The following tags now work as expected. The List of
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
It seems you're using v8.0.3. . .
Your example would be something like
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil
#+TOC: figures ## -- not implemented currently
#+LATEX: \listoffigures
The following generates the List of Figures
#+TOC: listings
No
I just noticed that the List of Figures is not being generated in 8.0.3.
I have a figure with;
#+LATEX: \listoffigures
#+ATTR_LaTeX: width=5.5cm
#+CAPTION: A Caption Here
#+LABEL: fig:test-figure-1
#+begin_src plantuml :file test-figure-1.png :cmdline -Tpng
plantuml stuff here
#+end_src
I have
Hi Luke!
I just noticed that the List of Figures is not being generated in 8.0.3.
I have a figure with;
#+LATEX: \listoffigures
#+ATTR_LaTeX: width=5.5cm
#+CAPTION: A Caption Here
#+LABEL: fig:test-figure-1
#+begin_src plantuml :file test-figure-1.png :cmdline -Tpng
plantuml stuff
22 matches
Mail list logo
