Re: [O] Narrowing vs indirect buffer

2014-01-25 Thread Bastien
Alan L Tyree writes: > Thanks Bastien. I like narrowing a lot better but only just discovered > it. It is a terrific facility. Also available with the `s' speedy key (just in case.) -- Bastien

Re: [O] Narrowing vs indirect buffer

2014-01-24 Thread Alan L Tyree
Bastien writes: > Alan L Tyree writes: > >> Is there any preference (so far as org is concerned)? Are there any >> "gotchas" that I should note? > > Just a personal preference: I use narrowing because I don't like > multiplying buffers. Thanks Bastien. I like narrowing a lot better but only just

Re: [O] Narrowing vs indirect buffer

2014-01-24 Thread Bastien
Alan L Tyree writes: > Is there any preference (so far as org is concerned)? Are there any > "gotchas" that I should note? Just a personal preference: I use narrowing because I don't like multiplying buffers. -- Bastien

[O] Narrowing vs indirect buffer

2014-01-24 Thread Alan L Tyree
Two separate commands serve much the same purpose from the author's point of view: - C-c C-x b (org-tree-to-indirect-buffer) opens an indirect buffer for the subtree - C-x n s (org-narrow-to-subtree) narrows the existing buffer to the subtree Both of these "hoist" the subtree outline to f