Re: [O] OT: two interesting articles about (non-)reproducible research

Rafael Laboissière writes: > * Nick Dokos [2016-04-08 14:54]: (...) >> 538.com has published a couple of interesting articles on some poli-sci >> research: >> >> >>

Re: [O] OT: two interesting articles about (non-)reproducible research

Rafael Laboissière writes: > * Nick Dokos [2016-04-08 14:54]: > >> [off-topic: not even a gratuitous org reference. My only excuse is >> the general interest of list members on reproducible research >> (org-babel! OK, that's the requisite gratuitous

Re: [O] OT: two interesting articles about (non-)reproducible research

* Nick Dokos [2016-04-08 14:54]: [off-topic: not even a gratuitous org reference. My only excuse is the general interest of list members on reproducible research (org-babel! OK, that's the requisite gratuitous reference: I feel better now :-) )] 538.com has published a

Re: [O] OT: two interesting articles about (non-)reproducible research

Thanks Nick, much appreciated. Long live org-babel! All the best, Tom Nick Dokos writes: > [off-topic: not even a gratuitous org reference. My only excuse is the > general interest of list members on reproducible research (org-babel! > OK, that's the requisite gratuitous reference: I feel

[O] OT: two interesting articles about (non-)reproducible research

[off-topic: not even a gratuitous org reference. My only excuse is the general interest of list members on reproducible research (org-babel! OK, that's the requisite gratuitous reference: I feel better now :-) )] 538.com has published a couple of interesting articles on some poli-sci research: