Mike McLean writes:
>> This is more easily accomplished using the target "oldorg".
>
> I did see the “oldorg” references in the email thread; my question is
> which one is more future proof? I guess (and please tell me if I am
> incorrect) that the oldorg build is just there for backwards
> compati
On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:49 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Mike McLean writes:
>> If anyone uses el-get (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get) the recipe
>> for building OrgMode broke with the recent Makefile changes. I
>> submitted a patch to el-get to change the OrgMode build
>> (https://github.com/dimitri
Mike McLean writes:
> If anyone uses el-get (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get) the recipe
> for building OrgMode broke with the recent Makefile changes. I
> submitted a patch to el-get to change the OrgMode build
> (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get/pull/719).
This is more easily accomplished usi
If anyone uses el-get (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get) the recipe for
building OrgMode broke with the recent Makefile changes. I submitted a patch to
el-get to change the OrgMode build (https://github.com/dimitri/el-get/pull/719).
Specifically, this patch references Samuel Wales’ message:
ht
