Hi Tobias,
Tobias Naehring i_in...@tn-home.de writes:
A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes would be to replace
the
code fragment
(progn
(message Executing %s cmd)
(shell-command cmd))
(error Abort
from
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Tobias Naehring i_in...@tn-home.de writes:
A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes would be to replace
the
code fragment
(progn
(message Executing %s cmd)
(shell-command cmd))
(error
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
BTW: are you aware of emacs-async at:
https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async
Yes.
It mainly make sense with time-consuming processes, though. I think
John is trying to push it to Emacs-core.
Not only with time-consuming processes, but for
Currently, only one asynchronous shell process can be started inside an org
buffer via
[[shell: ... ]]
The reason is that in `org-open-at-point' only the default shell output buffer
`*Shell Command Output*' is used for `shell-command'.
A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes
