Re: [O] RFC: Extensible Dependencies 'N' Actions

2017-04-24 Thread Adam Porter
Hi Ian, Don't have time to dig into this at the moment, but it sounds very impressive and useful. I look forward to giving it a try soon. Keep up the good work!

Re: [O] RFC: Extensible Dependencies 'N' Actions

2017-04-22 Thread Ian Dunn
Gergely Polonkai writes: > • Some finders have missing documentation (although their names are pretty > straightforward) Yup, working on that. > • Why the “new language”, why can’t it be lisp, or at least more lispish? Initially, I made it similar to org-depend.el, but as parsing became

Re: [O] RFC: Extensible Dependencies 'N' Actions

2017-04-21 Thread Gergely Polonkai
Hello Ian, I just read the docs and I like it so far. There are three things I’d mention: • Some finders have missing documentation (although their names are pretty straightforward) • Why the “new language”, why can’t it be lisp, or at least more lispish? • You gave us a possibility to create

[O] RFC: Extensible Dependencies 'N' Actions

2017-04-21 Thread Ian Dunn
I've been working on something akin to org-depend.el called org-edna. Basically, Edna provides an extensible means of specifying blocking conditions and trigger actions. For example, Edna allows you to specify that a task should be blocked until all TODOs have been addressed in source code: *