Hello,
Ben b...@maleloria.org writes:
Oh actually you went the 'line' way -- and not the column.
Considering, I actually think you're right.
I got used to the ReST way (1 item + sub-items = 1 column) but I think your
way seems more natural.
I went that way because it was easier to
I went that way because it was easier to implement. Though, there is
code somewhere to transpose tables (in Library of Babel, I think). So
you can type list items as columns instead, change the list into
a table, and transpose it. Voilà.
Brilliant! Thank you again Nicolas!
-- Ben
What is does it to transform a nested list in a simple table.
Just a thought.
If someone takes a stab at it, I suggest that they use my experimental
staging branch (org-html/org-odt) that implements callbacks for various
org entities like paragraphs, outline, lists and tables.
Without
Hello,
Ben b...@maleloria.org writes:
I'm thinking about a potential alternative and I would like to know if
anyone here would know if this can be done with org.
ReStructured Text [2] has a nice feature called list-tables. As you can
guess from the name, you write a list and an instruction
Out of boredom, I've written a draft for it.
Woohoo! congrats for the way you're getting bored!
Hey thank you Nicolas!
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
So here I'm guessing the whole code fits into Babel, right?
All of this will convert
(...)
| Row 1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Row 2 | 2.1 | 2.2
Ben b...@maleloria.org wrote:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
So here I'm guessing the whole code fits into Babel, right?
It depends on what you mean: you *can* use babel to evaluate the code
(C-c C-c on every code block, or similar), thereby loading it into your
current emacs, but if you want
I wish org-mode can do like this...
- Row 1 :exports tabel
- 1.1
- 1.2
- 1.3
- Row 2
- 2.1
- 2.2
- 2.3
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Ben b...@maleloria.org wrote:
Out of boredom, I've written a draft for it.
Woohoo! congrats for the way you're getting bored!
Hey thank you
