On 28/10/17 02:49, Olivier Berger wrote:
Hi.
I'm not exactly sure why that would be worth doing... but I can imagine
running that Emacs Web browser port over some kind of versioned file
system, and Emacs conf files (org + tangling, of course), so that you
have "your" org-mode at hand from
Personally, I don't think running it inside a browser would be a good
thing... both for keyboard shortcuts, and also for possible issues of
non-free JS (or not-machine-readable free JS information).
However, it's good to have interoperability with other collaborative
editing tools, such as Gobby
Hi, org-mode in a browser would be great indeed.
With https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/butterfly, you can get a terminal
in the browser, then run emacs in terminal mode. It is not ideal (some
keyboard shortcuts are intercepted by the browser), but it seems quite
interesting.
Olivier Berger
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 at 17:49:53 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> I've had this crazy idea to try and "port" emacs to the Web browser
> (using some tools like [[https://browsix.org/][browsix]]), for the
> purpose of running org-mode inside a browser tab.
>
> Anyone having had the same idea yet ?
A
2017-10-27 17:49 GMT+02:00 Olivier Berger <
olivier.ber...@telecom-sudparis.eu>:
> Hi.
>
> I've had this crazy idea to try and "port" emacs to the Web browser
> (using some tools like [[https://browsix.org/][browsix]]), for the
> purpose of running org-mode inside a browser tab.
>
> Anyone having
Hi.
I've had this crazy idea to try and "port" emacs to the Web browser
(using some tools like [[https://browsix.org/][browsix]]), for the
purpose of running org-mode inside a browser tab.
Anyone having had the same idea yet ?
Interestingly, porting a C program to browsix currently seem to rely
