Re: [O] Should org-get-outline-path strip dedicated targets?

Hello Nicolas, Custom IDs seem to be a good alternative here, although I would think about the <> part as an invisible part, since I don't expect it to be visible for e.g. export. Thanks. Regards, timor

Re: [O] Should org-get-outline-path strip dedicated targets?

Hello, timor writes: > If I have a document like this: > > * some header <> > ** some subtree > *** some entry > > Then calling org-get-outline-path on the deepest headline returns > ("some header <>" "some subtree") > > I don't know what exactly org-get-outline-path is used

[O] Should org-get-outline-path strip dedicated targets?

If I have a document like this: * some header <> ** some subtree *** some entry Then calling org-get-outline-path on the deepest headline returns ("some header <>" "some subtree") I don't know what exactly org-get-outline-path is used for in org mode, but for what I want to use it, I will