Re: [O] Sort order of TODO entries

2012-03-08 Thread Detlef Steuer
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:52:05 -0500 Bernt Hansen wrote: > Detlef Steuer writes: > > > Dear ORGers. > > > > recently I started to priorize my TODO items. > > (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to > > discuss that ... ) > > > > I found org sorts TODOs in the following w

Re: [O] Sort order of TODO entries

2012-03-08 Thread Matt Lundin
Hi Detlef, Detlef Steuer writes: > I don't understand the reasoning in putting TODOs without priority or > WAITING without priority before priority #C. > > Conceptually "no priority" (for me) means "not decided how important or > not important at all, but would like to work on it", In contrast

Re: [O] Sort order of TODO entries

2012-03-08 Thread Bernt Hansen
Detlef Steuer writes: > Dear ORGers. > > recently I started to priorize my TODO items. > (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to > discuss that ... ) > > I found org sorts TODOs in the following way in my agenda view: > > TODO [#A] > TODO [#B] > TODO/WAITING > TODO [#C

[O] Sort order of TODO entries

2012-03-08 Thread Detlef Steuer
Dear ORGers. recently I started to priorize my TODO items. (May be that implies failure of my GTD setup, but I don't want to discuss that ... ) I found org sorts TODOs in the following way in my agenda view: TODO [#A] TODO [#B] TODO/WAITING TODO [#C] I don't understand the reasoning in puttin