Hi Marcelo,
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> How was the process, from org file to tex to paper?
Brian Gough might be the one to answer this.
Brian worked on improving org.texi by submitting a lot of
patches -- improving the syntax, etc. See Org's git history
around november-december 2010 t
Nick Dokos writes:
> Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
>> How was the process, from org file to tex to paper? I think it'd be
>> nice if whoever did it (Carsten?) documented that on Worg. Org is
>> amazing as a publishing platform (for books and ebooks), but I feel
>> the information is still sca
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
> How was the process, from org file to tex to paper? I think it'd be
> nice if whoever did it (Carsten?) documented that on Worg. Org is
> amazing as a publishing platform (for books and ebooks), but I feel
> the information is still scattered around.
>
Unfortun
How was the process, from org file to tex to paper? I think it'd be nice if
whoever did it (Carnsten?) documented that on Worg. Org is amazing as a
publishing platform (for books and ebooks), but I feel the information is
still scattered around.
- Marcelo.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:51 PM, XeCycle
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Hey list,
Hello.
> The paper org manual was an exciting idea. I might buy one soon.
> I was wondering how was the editing work involved in turning it
> into paper-published book? What tools did you guys use?
TeXinfo, I think.
--
Carl Lei (XeCycle)
Departmen
Hey list,
The paper org manual was an exciting idea. I might buy one soon. I was
wondering how was the editing work involved in turning it into
paper-published book? What tools did you guys use?
Cheers,
- Marcelo.
