Also, they said there:
> I think you'll find that CommonHTML is faster at rendering the math
So:
1. Recommended for newer mathjax versions.
2. Fixed my problem with web fonts.
3. Faster.
It seems like a Pareto improvement to me.
TL;DR about the specific problem I was having with HTML-CSS:
> both HTML-CSS and CommonHTML use web fonts. But CommonHTML doesn't try to
> detect their presence, while HTML-CSS does, and it is that detection that is
> probably going wrong for some reason (I did say it was fragile). HTML-CSS
>
Hi all,
I was having some problems with the mathjax HTML-CSS backend and I
found out that the CHTML backend is currently the preferred one. See
details at https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax/issues/2132 and
http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/output.html. Changing the backend to
CHTML fixed my
