Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> The point of having the new macro is to avoid the question about
> reverting the file when the file visited by a buffer has been edited
> outside Emacs. You can do exactly the same changes (cosmetic or not)
> with both macros, but org-unmodified will ask you when
Bastien writes:
> I fixed the comment, thanks.
I'm starting to sound like Drew, but the new comment says exactly what
the old one did, just the two parts juxtaposed.
The point of having the new macro is to avoid the question about
reverting the file when the file visited by a buffer has been edit
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> We shouldn't define things that don't have an org prefix.
Fair enough.
(Note that `with-buffer-modified-unmodified', from which
org-unmodified was heavily copied, lives in bookmark.el. Perhaps
Emacs should put it elsewhere.)
> I don't really see why we needed
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> I hereby declare that XEmacs compatibility is broken already and he who
> wants to have this corrected should bring a working version of ert for
> XEmacs.
Let's encourage XEmacs users to report bugs and incompatibility.
Asking them to write an XEmacs ERT sounds a
Bastien writes:
> There is already this in org-macs.el:
>
> (when (and (not (fboundp 'with-silent-modifications))
> (or (< emacs-major-version 23)
> (and (= emacs-major-version 23)
> (< emacs-minor-version 2
> (defmacro with-silent-modifications (&rest
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> I hereby declare that I want Org to be fully functional for Emacs 23
>> and older, and I wish Org can be reasonably functional for Emacs <23
>> and XEmacs.
>
> If I may say so, XEmacs and Emacs up to 23.2 are missing
> with-silent-modifications,
Bastien writes:
> I hereby declare that I want Org to be fully functional for Emacs 23
> and older, and I wish Org can be reasonably functional for Emacs <23
> and XEmacs.
If I may say so, XEmacs and Emacs up to 23.2 are missing
with-silent-modifications, preferring to make them loudly.
Compatibi
Bastien writes:
>> No it's there, in gnus/time-date.elc ― maybe your versions are all
>> without Gnus?
>
> Yes, my versions come without Gnus. I directly downloaded them
> from xemacs.org (which is completely outdated by the way.)
Which means that our compatibility function doesn't provide
compa
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> And time-to-seconds seems absent -- but it seems absent from
>> *any* version of XEmacs I could check (21.4.1, 21.4.9, 21.5.9).
>
> No it's there, in gnus/time-date.elc — maybe your versions are all
> without Gnus?
Yes, my versions come without
Bastien writes:
> And time-to-seconds seems absent -- but it seems absent from
> *any* version of XEmacs I could check (21.4.1, 21.4.9, 21.5.9).
No it's there, in gnus/time-date.elc — maybe your versions are all
without Gnus?
> So yes, I think it's safe to remove this compat function. Let me kno
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien writes:
>> Fixed, thanks!
>
> Uh… no, you switched the wrong function in the second line (which
> incidentally indicates that this branch of the conditional never sees
> any testing). Fixed in master by using org-float-time.
Indeed, thanks for fixing this.
> I c
Bastien writes:
> Fixed, thanks!
Uh… no, you switched the wrong function in the second line (which
incidentally indicates that this branch of the conditional never sees
any testing). Fixed in master by using org-float-time. I checked in
XEmacs 21.5 and it has float-time, so maybe we wouldn't nee
Hi Thomas,
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
> Here is a warning I don't remember seeing before, posted here in case it
> is useful information:
>
> Compiling /Users/dk/.emacs.d/src/org-mode/lisp/org.el...
>
> In org-current-time:
> org.el:5341:16:Warning: `time-to-seconds' is an obsolete fu
Aloha all,
Here is a warning I don't remember seeing before, posted here in case it
is useful information:
Compiling /Users/dk/.emacs.d/src/org-mode/lisp/org.el...
In org-current-time:
org.el:5341:16:Warning: `time-to-seconds' is an obsolete function (as of
21.1); use `float-time' instead.
o
14 matches
Mail list logo
