[O] bug with timestamp fontification (bisected to b6b509b)

2013-02-27 Thread Nicolas Richard
This is bisected to b6b509b (which 467f7ff claims to fix, and indeed does partially) Reproduce by doing: emacs -q -L /home/youngfrog/sources/org-mode/lisp/ -f org-mode --eval '(insert 2012-02-27 Wed.)' = timestamp is not fontified. or instead emacs -q -L /home/youngfrog/sources/org-mode/lisp/

Re: [O] bug with timestamp fontification (bisected to b6b509b)

2013-02-27 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:54:54PM +0100, Nicolas Richard wrote: Reproduce by doing: emacs -q -L /home/youngfrog/sources/org-mode/lisp/ -f org-mode --eval '(insert 2012-02-27 Wed.)' ^ Are you

Re: [O] bug with timestamp fontification (bisected to b6b509b)

2013-02-27 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr writes: This is bisected to b6b509b (which 467f7ff claims to fix, and indeed does partially) I think I *completely* fixed this now... thanks for the heads up and the easy recipe! -- Bastien

Re: [O] bug with timestamp fontification (bisected to b6b509b)

2013-02-27 Thread Nicolas Richard
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:54:54PM +0100, Nicolas Richard wrote: emacs -q -L /home/youngfrog/sources/org-mode/lisp/ -f org-mode --eval '(insert 2012-02-27 Wed.)' Are you sure your timestamp has the correct syntax? As far as I know there

Re: [O] bug with timestamp fontification (bisected to b6b509b)

2013-02-27 Thread Nicolas Richard
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: I think I *completely* fixed this now... thanks for the heads up and the easy recipe! Thanks ; indeed dropping the change to the regexp seems the easiest (and may avoid problems with code relying on that regexp out of the core). May I suggest that you fix the

Re: [O] bug with timestamp fontification (bisected to b6b509b)

2013-02-27 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Richard theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr writes: May I suggest that you fix the commit just once more ? Part of the previous fix was to increase group number everywhere, and that has to be reverted. Here is a patch if you prefer : Applied... thanks! *Sigh*... I think I need to get