Hi Nicolas,
thanks again!
On Mi, Dez 21 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I would use (and, in fact, used)
>
> \\[\\([0-9]+\\)\\] --> \\[fn:\\1\\]
>
> and eyeballing the results.
That works quite well; but as I'm trying to convert a whole book I also
have lots of "\cite[NUMBER]{my_ref}" command
Hello,
Gerald Wildgruber writes:
> I had actually tried that already and came up with the following regex:
>
> \([^ ]\)\(\[\)\([0-9]\) --> \1\2fn:\3
>
> i.e. three groupings: 1) no whitespace, 2) "[" and 3) a number, and then
> introducing "fn:" between "[" and the number: but it is not perfect,
Hi Nicolas,
thanks:
I had actually tried that already and came up with the following regex:
\([^ ]\)\(\[\)\([0-9]\) --> \1\2fn:\3
i.e. three groupings: 1) no whitespace, 2) "[" and 3) a number, and then
introducing "fn:" between "[" and the number: but it is not perfect, as
it still gives fals
Hello,
Gerald Wildgruber writes:
> I'm trying to convert older orgmode documents which have plain,
> "[1]"-like footnotes into the newer "[fn:]" format.
>
> Can this be done automatically?
You could use `query-replace-regexp' a.k.a. C-M-%.
> Nicolas mentions "org-footnote-normalize" which woul
Hi,
I'm trying to convert older orgmode documents which have plain,
"[1]"-like footnotes into the newer "[fn:]" format.
Can this be done automatically?
In
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2015-12/msg00435.html
Nicolas mentions "org-footnote-normalize" which would turn old foot
