Dear Chuck,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Charles Berry wrote:
[snip extended brew example]
>
>
Whoa. That opens up a lot of possibilities I really hadn't thought
about before. *Thank you*.
--
Jay
Jay Kerns gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> I went back and spent some time to rethink how I was approaching my
> problem. Instead of inline src blocks like this:
>
> \( SRC_R{blah} \)
>
> or this
>
> | SRC_R{blah} |
[deleted noweb stuff]
> This method works. I think it would be cool if i
Hello,
I went back and spent some time to rethink how I was approaching my
problem. Instead of inline src blocks like this:
\( SRC_R{blah} \)
or this
| SRC_R{blah} |
or even this
\begin{equation}
SRC_R{blah}
\end{equation}
I could get by doing noweb substitution like this:
#+NAME: foo
#+BE
Hello there,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> This sounds like a question about the new exporter which is beyond my
> ken.
>
> However, code blocks may be called from Org-mode tables, using the `sbe'
> [1] macro.
>
> Hope this helps,
Thank you. Yes, it defini
Jay Kerns writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I am in the process of updating materials to the new exporter in
> anticipation of Org 8.0. It appears that inline SRC blocks are not
> being evaluated in table cells and math environments in the new
> exporter, for instance, something like this:
>
> \( SRC_R[:
Let me make clear: I'm talking about on export to LaTeX the code
blocks aren't evaluated. I can execute in the buffer and everything
works fine.
--
Jay
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jay Kerns wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am in the process of updating materials to the new exporter in
Greetings,
I am in the process of updating materials to the new exporter in
anticipation of Org 8.0. It appears that inline SRC blocks are not
being evaluated in table cells and math environments in the new
exporter, for instance, something like this:
\( SRC_R[:exports results]{2+3} \)
or like
