Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Sorry this took a while to get to...
I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope that's
true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
patches attached, a simple one that handles
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Sorry this took a while to get to...
I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope that's
true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
patches attached, a simple
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
The patch series that would not die!
:)
Applied, thanks!
--
Bastien
Thanks Eric - I've used this patch but I doesn't seem to solve the problem.
I'm working on an earlier suggestion by Michael about the unicode type that
my Tibetan font is. I very much appreciate all this help!
Steffan
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.netwrote:
Ah yes, this won't work if your font draws characters at variable
widths. I use Chinese a lot, and some Chinese fonts will still create
misalignment, simply because a Chinese character as drawn as 192% the
width of an ascii character. Dunno how to get around that.
On 02/11/14 10:50 AM, Steffan
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I've been using that patch or something like it for nearly a year now,
with no adverse effects. I'm on the road right now, give me a day and
I'll take a closer look at what I've got...
Great -- thanks in advance!
Hi Steffan
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Michael Brand
michael.ch.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any font that is monospaced even in the Tibetan range at all?
On one of my trips of learning more about unicode I just discovered
the monospaced bitmap font GNU Unifont [1] [2] which implements
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Steffan,
thanks for reporting this.
Steffan Iverson steffan.iver...@gmail.com writes:
Any way to solve this problem?
This is a recurring problem, and Eric is the one who tried
to solve it.
Eric, I don't remember why we didn't follow-up on your patch
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
I've been using that patch or something like it for nearly a year now,
with no adverse effects. I'm on the road right now, give me a day and
I'll take a closer look at what I've got...
Great -- thanks in advance! I'll then wait before releasing
Hi Steffan
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Steffan Iverson
steffan.iver...@gmail.com wrote:
Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg
Judging from e. g. this part
| རྐུས་ | rkus |
| གསོས་ | gsos |
in your screenshot my speculation is that you get glyphs from not only your
default monospace
Michael, that test case you suggest does indeed cause the same spacing
problem. So this isn't a problem from the vowel stacking in Tibetan,
because of the type of font it is? Sorry, generally new to Emacs so I'm not
sure how to move forward with that insight.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:13 AM,
Hi Steffan
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Steffan Iverson
steffan.iver...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael, that test case you suggest does indeed cause the same spacing
problem. So this isn't a problem from the vowel stacking in Tibetan,
Such combining characters and and also double width characters
Hi Steffan,
thanks for reporting this.
Steffan Iverson steffan.iver...@gmail.com writes:
Any way to solve this problem?
This is a recurring problem, and Eric is the one who tried
to solve it.
Eric, I don't remember why we didn't follow-up on your patch
here:
Hello all,
I've made an org table that includes both English and Tibetan characters,
and the columns don't line up. I suspect this is because of the way Tibetan
characters are displayed - they stack below and above each other, making
the characters vertically taller than the English characters.
Screenshot: http://oi59.tinypic.com/lz893.jpg
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Steffan Iverson
steffan.iver...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
I've made an org table that includes both English and Tibetan characters,
and the columns don't line up. I suspect this is because of the way
Tibetan
15 matches
Mail list logo
