Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Michael Welle writes: > *** More specific anniversary descriptions > > Anniversary descriptions (used in the agenda view, for instance) > include the point in time, when the anniversary appears. This is, > in its most general form, just the date of the anniversary.

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-13 Thread Michael Welle
Hello, oops, I think the double space after full stop rule applies here, too. Sorry for the noise. Michael Welle writes: [...] >> Could you provide an ORG-NEWS entry for the feature? > > *** More specific anniversary descriptions Anniversary descriptions (used in the agenda

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-13 Thread Michael Welle
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > Michael Welle writes: > > > thank you for the valuable comments. I think I've incorporated them all. > > Furthermore I reworded some of the comments and I introduced a defvar, > > so that the point in time, when to switch to the

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-12 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Michael Welle writes: > thank you for the valuable comments. I think I've incorporated them all. > Furthermore I reworded some of the comments and I introduced a defvar, > so that the point in time, when to switch to the more general > descriptive text isn't hardcoded

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Welle
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Michael Welle writes: > >> Maybe it's a tiny change, if we strip the comments ;). It's not too >> sophisticated, everyone could have done it. > > I definitely think it _is_ a tiny change. > > Some comments

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Michael Welle writes: > Maybe it's a tiny change, if we strip the comments ;). It's not too > sophisticated, everyone could have done it. I definitely think it _is_ a tiny change. Some comments follow. > +(defun org-bbdb-anniversary-description (agenda-date

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Michael Welle
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > On 2017-03-01 15:03, Michael Welle writes: > >>> I don't think it helps. IIRC, code integration in Emacs is pretty >>> strict. You could simply sign FSF papers. >> Yes. Trouble is nobody could explain to me what I

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Rasmus
Michael Welle writes: > Hello, > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Michael Welle writes: >> >>> Even if we assume its quality is high enough to integrate it into Org, >> >> If code quality was a concern, Org would still be

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2017-03-01 15:03, Michael Welle writes: >> I don't think it helps. IIRC, code integration in Emacs is pretty >> strict. You could simply sign FSF papers. > Yes. Trouble is nobody could explain to me what I have to sign and what > that means in the legal system I'm in. My

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Michael Welle
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Michael Welle writes: > >> Even if we assume its quality is high enough to integrate it into Org, > > If code quality was a concern, Org would still be in alpha release ;) thank you for your kind words,

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Michael Welle writes: > Even if we assume its quality is high enough to integrate it into Org, If code quality was a concern, Org would still be in alpha release ;) > there might or might not be another problem: I haven't signed the FSF > papers. I would like to see

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Marco Wahl
binMkTW0VNkZi.bin Description: application/pgp-encrypted binE8pzhIaYry.bin Description: Binary data

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Marco Wahl
Alan Schmitt writes: > Hello, > > On 2016-07-14 14:09, Michael Welle writes: > >> Hello, >> >> org-bbdb-anniversaries-future uses the following format to insert >> anniversaries into the agenda: >> >> Birthday: [[bbdb:foo bar][foo bar (37th) --

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Michael Welle
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: [...] > Sorry for reviving this old thread, but was this added to org? I would > find it most useful. no, it's not. Even if we assume its quality is high enough to integrate it into Org, there might or might not be another problem: I

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2017-03-01 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello, On 2016-07-14 14:09, Michael Welle writes: > Hello, > > org-bbdb-anniversaries-future uses the following format to insert > anniversaries into the agenda: > > Birthday: [[bbdb:foo bar][foo bar (37th) -- 2016-07-14]] > > Seeing the date in the agenda makes me feel like

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2016-07-14 Thread Marco Wahl
Hi! > org-bbdb-anniversaries-future uses the following format to insert > anniversaries into the agenda: > > Birthday: [[bbdb:foo bar][foo bar (37th) -- 2016-07-14]] > > Seeing the date in the agenda makes me feel like I have a lot of time to > get a present. Then, just before the shops close, I

Re: [O] org-bbdb-anniversaries-future

2016-03-08 Thread Georges
Nick Dokos gmail.com> writes: > Michael Welle gmx.net> writes: > > > Marco Wahl gmail.com> writes: > > > >> BTW I use `org-bbdb-anniversaries-future'. See section "Anniversaries > >> from BBDB" in the info documentation (info "(org) Weekly/daily agenda"). Not present in latest org elpa