Leo sdl@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
is there an agreement here on whether the patch appearing in this
thread
http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/783/
should be applied or not?
I don't really know.
Ditto. :-)
The problem is that creating a link to a message with no Gcc errors
right
On May 24, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Leo sdl@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
is there an agreement here on whether the patch appearing in this
thread
http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/783/
should be applied or not?
I don't really know.
Ditto. :-)
The problem is
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Basically, there should be a possibility to let the link creator
functions return yes, I was the right handler, but because of reason X,
I couldn't create a link. Is there something like that?
What happens if you return t in this case,
On May 24, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Basically, there should be a possibility to let the link creator
functions return yes, I was the right handler, but because of reason X,
I couldn't create a link. Is there something like
Hi,
is there an agreement here on whether the patch appearing in this thread
http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/783/
should be applied or not?
- Carsten
On 8.5.2011, at 09:53, Leo wrote:
On 2011-05-05 17:19 +0800, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
[elide 4 lines]
This sounds interesting (at least
On 2011-05-24 11:19 +0800, Carsten Dominik wrote:
is there an agreement here on whether the patch appearing in this thread
http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/783/
should be applied or not?
- Carsten
I don't really know.
The patch merely goes back to the same behaviour before the patch
On 2011-05-05 17:19 +0800, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
[elide 4 lines]
This sounds interesting (at least for those that use gmail). Is the URL
where the archived message will be available predictable, i.e. is it
possible to know it while still composing the message? If yes, it would
be great to
Leo sdl@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-05-04 21:14 +0800, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
The idea behind `org-store-link' (which is triggered by `org-capture')
in message mode is to store a link to a /sent/ message even though the
message has not been sent by the time you call `org-store-link'. This
On 2011-05-05 15:02 +0800, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Hmmm, is it? Suppose that linking to a message yet to be archived
wouldn't be there, then `org-store-link' will tell you `org-store-link:
Cannot link to a buffer which is not visiting a file' when called in a
message buffer (like in any other
On 2011-05-05 15:59 +0800, Leo wrote:
I believe the following patch is due.
Think about it some more, there is a reason to signal an error when
calling org-store-link interactively but it should not when invoked by
org-capture. Otherwise it will get in the way.
Leo
Leo sdl@gmail.com wrote:
On 2011-05-05 15:02 +0800, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
Hmmm, is it? Suppose that linking to a message yet to be archived
wouldn't be there, then `org-store-link' will tell you `org-store-link:
Cannot link to a buffer which is not visiting a file' when called in a
Leo sdl@gmail.com wrote:
I am running orgmode from git 2011-04-29 on Emacs 23.3.50.
In a message mode buffer, M-x org-capture to get the following error:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error Can not create link: No Gcc header
found.)
signal(error (Can not create link: No Gcc header
On 2011-05-04 21:14 +0800, Ulf Stegemann wrote:
The idea behind `org-store-link' (which is triggered by `org-capture')
in message mode is to store a link to a /sent/ message even though the
message has not been sent by the time you call `org-store-link'. This
currently works only with Gnus
13 matches
Mail list logo
