Re: [O] org-meta-return not on M-RET

Hello, Scott Otterson writes: > The purpose of the M-RET binding is to allow quick splitting of long > headlines generated during rapid brainstorming e.g. > > * Common pets are cats and dogs > > Can be quickly converted using M-RET to: > > * Common pets are > * cats and >

Re: [O] org-meta-return not on M-RET

Hello, Allen Li writes: > I believe Emacs does intelligent remapping; for example if you type > M-return in GUI Emacs, if there are no bindings for M-return it will > look up the binding for M-RET. Therefore simply binding M-RET and > removing the M-return binding is

Re: [O] org-meta-return not on M-RET

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Allen Li writes: > >> When I could not get org-meta-return to work in terminal Emacs, I >> realized that org-meta-return is only bound to M-return and not M-RET. >> Is there any

Re: [O] org-meta-return not on M-RET

Hi Nicolas, Allen, * Nicolas Goaziou [2017-09-16; 17:20]: > Allen Li writes: > >> When I could not get org-meta-return to work in terminal Emacs, I >> realized that org-meta-return is only bound to M-return and not M-RET. >> Is there any

Re: [O] org-meta-return not on M-RET

Hello, Allen Li writes: > When I could not get org-meta-return to work in terminal Emacs, I > realized that org-meta-return is only bound to M-return and not M-RET. > Is there any particular reason for this? No idea. Fixed. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

[O] org-meta-return not on M-RET

When I could not get org-meta-return to work in terminal Emacs, I realized that org-meta-return is only bound to M-return and not M-RET. Is there any particular reason for this?

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Hello, 42 147 writes: > I notice that org-meta-return now inserts a space between the new headline > and the previous headline. This was not the functionality before (not sure > which update changed it). Not sure to understand "before" what. In any case, wouldn't you be

[O] org-meta-return

Hello, I notice that org-meta-return now inserts a space between the new headline and the previous headline. This was not the functionality before (not sure which update changed it). Either that, or I preferred defective functionality all along. Any way to restore the old org-meta-return?

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Hi John On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:59 AM, 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: That said, were you a QWERTY user before you transitioned into Colemak? Yes. Michael

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: Hi John On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: [continues off-topic] Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found no empirical evidence that it is actually

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Hi John On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: [continues off-topic] Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been proven, in /some/

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Michael, Did a little research on Colemak: appears to be (1) as or even slightly more ergonomic than Dvorak, in terms of measurable results; and (2) designed for QWERTY users. That said, were you a QWERTY user before you transitioned into Colemak? . . . Does anyone here type Russian

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes: [...] I hope everybody does that. I use both the left and right control keys depending on where the controlled key is: C-whatever is always a two-hand operation for me. M-x is not however (they are close enough so that left thumb and index can do

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Eric, Eric S Fraga wrote: Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes: [...] I hope everybody does that. I use both the left and right control keys depending on where the controlled key is: C-whatever is always a two-hand operation for me. M-x is not however (they are close enough so that left

Re: [O] org-meta-return

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:10:13PM +0100, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Quite a bit OT, but is it true that, for example, to type `C-whatever', we should use both hands, one for `C' and the other for `whatever'? I determine that depending on the key combination. e.g. C-x or C-s I do with my left

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: Eric, [...] Quite a bit OT, but is it true that, for example, to type `C-whatever', we should use both hands, one for `C' and the other for `whatever'? Hi Seb, Yes, just as one should do with the shift key. However, the problem with C-

Re: [O] org-meta-return

42 147 aeuster at gmail.com writes: [continues off-topic] Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior;

Re: [O] org-meta-return

[continues off-topic] Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a cost-benefit standpoint,

[O] org-meta-return

Invaluable command, but often I want to insert a new headline at point that is one level down; i.e.: *** topic_1 [COMMAND] subtopic As an expansion to: *** topic_1 M-RET *** topic_2

Re: [O] org-meta-return

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:32:16PM -0500, 42 147 wrote: Invaluable command, but often I want to insert a new headline at point that is one level down; i.e.: *** topic_1 [COMMAND] subtopic M-RET M-right -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.

Re: [O] org-meta-return

M-RET M-right Appreciate the reply, but that's worse than what I was doing. M-right is not anywhere close to my high frequency areas of finger activity. I've changed all such keybindings. I notice that C-M-RET is undefined. If anyone wants to add the functionality as described in my original

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Hello On 20 February 2013 16:17, 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: M-RET M-right Appreciate the reply, but that's worse than what I was doing. M-right is not anywhere close to my high frequency areas of finger activity. I've changed all such keybindings. You can also use TAB on an empty

Re: [O] org-meta-return

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 04:17:48PM -0500, 42 147 wrote: I notice that C-M-RET is undefined. If anyone wants to add the functionality as described in my original post, and bind it to that key chord, I would be grateful; in the meantime, I'll create a macro / interactive defun to do the same.

Re: [O] org-meta-return

42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: M-RET M-right Appreciate the reply, but that's worse than what I was doing. M-right is not anywhere close to my high frequency areas of finger activity I've changed all such keybindings. In all three keyboards I use regularly, right is fairly close to RET

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes: That's not too bad because it's not as if this is a frequent activity for me. Org's standard keymaps also use arrow keys fairly heavily, so changing all of them sounds like a lot of work: I've tried swimming against such tides before, but invariably I

Re: [O] org-meta-return

You can also use TAB on an empty headline to cycle through the various levels: +1 level, -1 level, -2..n levels (until it reaches the top level *), and then back to the level it was created at. Good to know, but I ended up with a simple defun and org-mode-hook. Will probably add what you said

Re: [O] org-meta-return

[Warning: off-topic] 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: My hands might be smaller than average, or, at least, smaller than yours. To reach right I must shift my entire arm to the right and downward. To reach RET no such movement is necessary. Maybe a slight turn of the wrist to the right. I

Re: [O] org-meta-return

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:11:38PM -0500, Nick Dokos wrote: [Warning: off-topic] 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: My hands might be smaller than average, or, at least, smaller than yours. To reach right I must shift my entire arm to the right and downward. To reach RET no such movement

Re: [O] org-meta-return

Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:11:38PM -0500, Nick Dokos wrote: [Warning: off-topic] 42 147 aeus...@gmail.com wrote: My hands might be smaller than average, or, at least, smaller than yours. To reach right I must shift my entire arm to