At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:03:40 -0500,
Matt Lundin wrote:
David Maus dm...@ictsoc.de writes:
At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:19 +0200,
David Maus wrote:
Hi Matt,
Hi Sebastien,
I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
with refile and capture. Both depend on a
Hi Matt,
Hi Sebastien,
I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
with refile and capture. Both depend on a buggy behavior of
org-paste-subtree, i.e. pasting a subtree *above* the target headline
when called with point at the beginning of the target headline.
A fix for
At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:19 +0200,
David Maus wrote:
Hi Matt,
Hi Sebastien,
I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
with refile and capture. Both depend on a buggy behavior of
org-paste-subtree, i.e. pasting a subtree *above* the target headline
when called
David Maus dm...@ictsoc.de writes:
At Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:25:19 +0200,
David Maus wrote:
Hi Matt,
Hi Sebastien,
I pushed a temporary workaround to master that should fix the problem
with refile and capture. Both depend on a buggy behavior of
org-paste-subtree, i.e. pasting a subtree
The following commit broke org-paste-subtree (and, as a result, refile):
,
| commit ece3091f16af246780e29ba6e8248dd8bb3b7ba2
| Author: David Maus dm...@ictsoc.de
| Date: Wed Aug 10 18:38:26 2011 +0200
|
| Don't eat headline when yank with point at existing headline
|
| *
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
If I kill subtree Four and call org-paste-subtree with the point on
Two (or if I refile it to Two), I get the following:
* One
Text in one
* Two
* Four
Text in four
Text in two
* Three
Text in three
I should add that the correct result (and
