But I'm often bitten by the distinction between export and tangling --
:padline, :shebang come to mind, where I expected org-babel to honour
the setting in both cases.
Could you describe a use case where these options would be used for
exporting and would be preferable to simply including
Eric Schulte eric.schu...@gmx.com writes:
But I'm often bitten by the distinction between export and tangling --
:padline, :shebang come to mind, where I expected org-babel to honour
the setting in both cases.
Could you describe a use case where these options would be used for
exporting
Tom Regner t...@goochesa.de writes:
Eric Schulte eric.schu...@gmx.com writes:
But I'm often bitten by the distinction between export and tangling --
:padline, :shebang come to mind, where I expected org-babel to honour
the setting in both cases.
Could you describe a use case where these
Eric Schulte eric.schu...@gmx.com wrote:
I just pushed up a patch which adds this behavior. It does result in
some odd new possibilities, such as the following.
#+begin_src sh :shebang #!/bin/cat
foo
#+end_src
#+RESULTS:
| #!/bin/cat |
||
| foo|
Maybe my
Thanks tom! This is exactly what I need.
regards,
robb
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Tom Regner t...@goochesa.de wrote:
Hi,
Panruo Wu p...@mymail.mines.edu writes:
Dear list,
#+begin_src sh
for np in {1..32}
do
echo $np
done
#+end_src
when executing, the output
Tom Regner t...@goochesa.de wrote:
Hi,
Panruo Wu p...@mymail.mines.edu writes:
Dear list,
#+begin_src sh=C2=A0
for np in {1..32}
do
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 echo $np
done
#+end_src
when executing, the output only shows
{1..32}
which is clearly not I want..
After some
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com schrieb:
Tom Regner t...@goochesa.de wrote:
Hi,
Panruo Wu p...@mymail.mines.edu writes:
Dear list,
#+begin_src sh=C2=A0
for np in {1..32}
do
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 echo $np
done
#+end_src
when executing, the output only shows
{1..32}
which
Dear list,
#+begin_src sh
for np in {1..32}
do
echo $np
done
#+end_src
when executing, the output only shows
{1..32}
which is clearly not I want..
After some investigation, I found that orgmode
uses sh that cannot understand the for loop above.
My question is, how can I suggest orgmode to
Panruo Wu p...@mymail.mines.edu wrote:
Dear list,
#+begin_src sh
for np in {1..32}
do
echo $np
done
#+end_src
when executing, the output only shows
{1..32}
which is clearly not I want..
After some investigation, I found that orgmode
uses sh that cannot understand the for loop
Hi,
Panruo Wu p...@mymail.mines.edu writes:
Dear list,
#+begin_src sh
for np in {1..32}
do
echo $np
done
#+end_src
when executing, the output only shows
{1..32}
which is clearly not I want..
After some investigation, I found that orgmode
uses sh that cannot understand the
10 matches
Mail list logo
