Hello,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> in recent maint, it seems ret on link follows the link. is this
>> intended? i thought we fixed that so you could do a ret after a link
>> and get a newline?
>
> Timestamps, too, which
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> Samuel Wales writes:
>>
>>> in recent maint, it seems ret on link follows the link. is this
>>> intended? i thought we fixed that so you could do a ret
Samuel Wales writes:
> in recent maint, it seems ret on link follows the link. is this
> intended? i thought we fixed that so you could do a ret after a link
> and get a newline?
Timestamps, too, which can be annoying in Capture buffers...
in recent maint, it seems ret on link follows the link. is this
intended? i thought we fixed that so you could do a ret after a link
and get a newline?