That's a nice idea. Integration would be cool, besides, a
taskwarrior2org (to sync back to the original org files) would be
useful. Since CLI is a simpler interface, it could be used from
anywhere where ssh is available... smartphones, for example; although
we already have mobile-org. Food for thou
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Bastien, Carnsten, what do you guys think of Taskwarrior? :)
I think it's pretty neat and that creating an org2taskwarrior export
should be easy so that we can benefit of the nice taskwarrior graphs.
--
Bastien
___
Hi,
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:52:25 +, Eric S Fraga ("ESF") wrote:
>> What about using org-protocol? If you have a capture template like:
>>
>> ("x" "store todo item from command line" entry
>> (file+headline "todo.org" "Tasks")
>> "* TODO %i\n\t%u")
>>
>> You can use someth
Hi,
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:52:25 +, Eric S Fraga ("ESF") wrote:
>> What about using org-protocol? If you have a capture template like:
>>
>> ("x" "store todo item from command line" entry
>> (file+headline "todo.org" "Tasks")
>> "* TODO %i\n\t%u")
>>
>> You can use someth
Dirk-Jan C. Binnema writes:
[...]
> ESF> However, it's the first step towards the original specification. We
> ESF> want to be able to simply have the note saved -- that is, no
> interaction
> ESF> with emacs directly. Can this be done as well?
>
> Sure, there is the immediate-finish pr
As I understand it, D-bus works on windows, OSX, GNU/Linux.
Why reinvent the wheel?
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Must be something that is really cross-platform. Don't forget there
> are OSX and Windows users around!
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Christopher Allan Webber
> wrote:
>
Dirk-Jan C. Binnema writes:
> Hi,
>
>> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:19:51 +, Eric S Fraga ("ESF") wrote:
>
> >> Imagine being able to pop open a terminal and type '$ org-todo "call so
> and
> >> so on friday" ~/org/task.org' and be done :)
>
> ESF> I can already do:
>
> ESF> : emacscli
Hi,
> On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:19:51 +, Eric S Fraga ("ESF") wrote:
>> Imagine being able to pop open a terminal and type '$ org-todo "call so and
>> so on friday" ~/org/task.org' and be done :)
ESF> I can already do:
ESF> : emacsclient -e '(org-capture nil "t")'
ESF> to invoke
On 2/4/2011 11:16 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Mark Elston writes:
On 2/3/2011 8:03 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
Emacs can run as a dameon and as that you could access it via
emacsclient. What is needed is a nice interface to allow to send simple
requests to insert and fetch data from or
I think such a shell-script wrapper around an emacs-client or emacs
batch Org-mode instance sounds like a very nice idea -- and not overly
difficult to implement.
Here is a quick approach to implementing the org agenda example you
suggested below [1] notice that the script is structured to dispatc
Mark Elston writes:
> On 2/3/2011 8:03 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
>> Hi Marcelo,
>>
>> Emacs can run as a dameon and as that you could access it via
>> emacsclient. What is needed is a nice interface to allow to send simple
>> requests to insert and fetch data from org-mode. Some of the org-mode
>
Must be something that is really cross-platform. Don't forget there
are OSX and Windows users around!
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Christopher Allan Webber
wrote:
> Dbus bindings?
>
> Torsten Wagner writes:
>
>> Hi Marcelo,
>>
>> Emacs can run as a dameon and as that you could access it via
Dbus bindings?
Torsten Wagner writes:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Emacs can run as a dameon and as that you could access it via
> emacsclient. What is needed is a nice interface to allow to send
> simple requests to insert and fetch data from org-mode. Some of the
> org-mode function might do this already
John Hendy writes:
[...]
> Perhaps a nice tradeoff would be to get something from the command line that
> could work with one's remember template via the command line. This is
yes, using org-capture does help a lot and combining this with
emacsclient does give the ability to do command line cap
On 2/3/2011 8:03 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
Emacs can run as a dameon and as that you could access it via
emacsclient. What is needed is a nice interface to allow to send simple
requests to insert and fetch data from org-mode. Some of the org-mode
function might do this already, howev
Hi Marcelo,
Emacs can run as a dameon and as that you could access it via
emacsclient. What is needed is a nice interface to allow to send simple
requests to insert and fetch data from org-mode. Some of the org-mode
function might do this already, however, I guess a decent layer which
hides t
Hi Marcelo,
A CLI client would be nice, but IMHO, I don't think it would be faster
than the operating org from emacs; perhaps for a couple of basic
stuff, but I think that depends strongly on personal tastes.
For me the most nicest part to have a CLI interface to org-mode would be
the fact th
If we could somehow turn emacs into a headless server, it would be
nice. I don't know enough elisp or emacs architecture to know if it
could be turned into a web server, for example. But that's an awesome
idea.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
> Hi John
>
> Actually, this com
Hi John
Actually, this comes down to the point which was discussed already
sometimes. Creating a org-mode API which could be accessed from
CLI-tools was well as from other programs (Thunderbird and Firfox
plugins come to my mind but Conky and other programs might use it to
extract data from o
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe someone should contact the devs there and invite them (to come to
> this email list and/or vice versa).
> There is really some beauty in the idea to use dead simple command line
> tools to getting things fast and quickly done. O
Hi Tosten,
They are already talking about org, check this out:
http://taskwarrior.org/boards/8/topics/show/208
A CLI client would be nice, but IMHO, I don't think it would be faster
than the operating org from emacs; perhaps for a couple of basic
stuff, but I think that depends strongly on perso
Hi,
maybe someone should contact the devs there and invite them (to come to
this email list and/or vice versa).
There is really some beauty in the idea to use dead simple command line
tools to getting things fast and quickly done. On the other hand
org-mode has so many useful functions.
It wou
@Erik -- that sounds awesome! Really looking forward to it.
Have you guys noticed the coincidence? We have two Eri[k][c]s here :D
Bastien, Carnsten, what do you guys think of Taskwarrior? :)
Cheers,
Marcelo.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Erik Iverson wrote:
>
>
> Eric S Fraga wrote:
>>
>> E
Eric S Fraga wrote:
Erik Iverson writes:
Marcelo,
I've started dreaming of a system called 'org-dashboard'
[...]
I'm very much in the design phase now, no code. I should have some
but sounds good! I look forward to it.
The trick will be to ensure that the correct data have been rec
Erik Iverson writes:
> Marcelo,
>
> I've started dreaming of a system called 'org-dashboard'
[...]
> I'm very much in the design phase now, no code. I should have some
but sounds good! I look forward to it.
The trick will be to ensure that the correct data have been recorded.
For instance,
Marcelo,
I've started dreaming of a system called 'org-dashboard'
that will do things like this. E.g., progress tracking for
projects, books, weight loss goals. Graphics of time tracking
for sleeping hours, work hours, exercise hours, etc. Simple
counts of how many Coke's you drink, etc. The
Yeah, it's a quite nice project. I don't think it'd work for me as a
PIM environment though. I think emacs (or vim with the new
org-compatible plugin) will always be faster in this sense. Also, it
lacks the reference aspect of any GTD system (a wiki or wiki-like
collection of reference documents) w
By the way, now that you mention it, Eric. Is there anything right now
that can generate graphs akin to what taskwarrior generates for
archived org data? This would be awesome to track progress.
Marcelo.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
wrote:
> Yeah, it's a quite nice pr
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> Hey list,
>
> I just found out about Taskwarrior today - http://taskwarrior.org. It
> seems to be a quite ambitious project to turn the CLI into a
> full-fledged GTD environment. I wouldn't leave org for it, but I
> thought it's quite nice and maybe some ideas co
Hey list,
I just found out about Taskwarrior today - http://taskwarrior.org. It
seems to be a quite ambitious project to turn the CLI into a
full-fledged GTD environment. I wouldn't leave org for it, but I
thought it's quite nice and maybe some ideas could be borrowed or even
integrations made. An
30 matches
Mail list logo