On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all
this
sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
entry-barrier for new Org users.
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
> sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
> entry-barrier for new Org
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
> 2. Then we should lay out an easy route and a full route:
> 1. Quick and easy
> Download, set your load-path and (require 'org-install)
> Optionally compile (within emacs[1]?)
> Suggested text below.
> 2. Full install
>
On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:33 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all
this
sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
entry-barrier for new Org users. F
I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
entry-barrier for new Org users. For example, the first thing users
encounter in the man
