On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Carsten Dominik domi...@science.uva.nl wrote:
The reason for this assumption is that as of now, you are the only
person *I know* who uses this have-ready state of checkboxes.
Given the fact that I every now and then do need to remove
a checkbox, this seemed the
Hi Chris,
this was an intentional change, I thought that a
simple command to get rid of a checkbox was more
important.
I have put setting to [-] back in now, but you will need a
double prefix
C-u C-u C-c C-c
HTH
- Carsten
On Feb 14, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Chris Randle wrote:
Hi Carsten
Hi Carsten
Carsten Dominik wrote:
this was an intentional change, I thought that a
simple command to get rid of a checkbox was more
important.
I have put setting to [-] back in now, but you will need a double
prefix
Thanks for doing that. The 6.22b manual needs updating on p46 (half-way
Hi Chris,
On Feb 15, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Chris Randle wrote:
Mini-example
of being part-way working through the finished list with a defrag
kicked
off:
*** TODO Finish up
- [X] Uninstall WinPcap driver
- [X] Uninstall UltraVNC
- [-] Defrag
- [ ] Reset screen resolution to
Hi Carsten
Until recently, if I used `C-u C-c C-c' with the cursor on the line with
Item B in the following example:
- [X] Item A
- [ ] Item B
- [ ] Item C
I'd get:
- [X] Item A
- [-] Item B
- [ ] Item C
Now (6.21b) I get:
- [X] Item A
- Item B
- [ ] Item C
Think this may be an
