On Oct 15, 2007, at 21:08, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Sounds like my argument did not convince you. :-)
No, you misunderstand. I do see why you might want to mark
appointments TODO (even if I would not do it). But
"scheduled" in the context of Org has to do with *planning*.
You *plan* to work on t
Sounds like my argument did not convince you. :-) But a new variable
works for me. I really appreciate the extra effort you take.
Wanrong
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Well,
I am not about the change the meaning of "scheduled", but I can give
you a new
variable `org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date
Well,
I am not about the change the meaning of "scheduled", but I can give
you a new
variable `org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date'. How about that?
- Carsten
On Oct 14, 2007, at 17:45, Wanrong Lin wrote:
That's certainly an option. But usually I like to mark any
"actionable" items with "TO
That's certainly an option. But usually I like to mark any "actionable"
items with "TODO", while using non-TODO entries to record information,
or to group TODOs into logical groups. Like this:
* Dental
*** TODO See Dr. Xyz for cleaning
<2007-11-29 Thu 09:00>
* Medical
*** TODO See Dr. Abc f
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:35, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to follow GTD's principle that tasks should be reviewed
regularly. So I first turn on "org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled", and
do a "List of all TODO entries, and then review all tasks in the list.
However, I found that tasks with
Hi,
I am trying to follow GTD's principle that tasks should be reviewed
regularly. So I first turn on "org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled", and do
a "List of all TODO entries, and then review all tasks in the list.
However, I found that tasks with plain active time stamps ("appointment
tasks")
