I'm impressed at how the new footnote support has managed to put together
readability, stability, ease of use and export-ability (including the
ability to refer to a footnote multiple times!) . I have seen no problems
in my initial tests, and will do more extensive (can I break anything?)
tests as
Fixed, thanks.
- Carsten
On Jan 3, 2009, at 11:53 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for the quick response. I've written a couple of additional
comments below.
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Matt, thanks for this much needed feedback. I was already working
into the direction of s
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for the quick response. I've written a couple of additional
comments below.
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Matt, thanks for this much needed feedback. I was already working
> into the direction of some of your proposals, but certainly not all.
>
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:10 PM,
Hi Matt, thanks for this much needed feedback. I was already working
into the direction of some of your proposals, but certainly not all.
On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Matt,
the bug is fixed now, thanks for the report.
Also, you
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Matt,
>
> the bug is fixed now, thanks for the report.
>
> Also, you can set org-footnote-section to nil
> if you want non-inline footnotes to be defined
> in the outline node where they are referenced, instead
> of a special outline node "Footnotes".
T
Hi Matt,
the bug is fixed now, thanks for the report.
Also, you can set org-footnote-section to nil
if you want non-inline footnotes to be defined
in the outline node where they are referenced, instead
of a special outline node "Footnotes".
- Carsten
On Jan 1, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Matthew Lundin
Hi Carsten,
First of all, let me say thank you for this wonderful addition to
org-mode. I will certainly do more of my writing in org-mode now.
Incredible!
I've tested the new footnote feature and can get everything to work
except anonymous footnotes. When using more than one anonymous
footnote,
Hi,
the result of this discussion about footnotes is now
in the latest git version, see
http://orgmode.org/Changes.html#sec-1.1.1
for more information.
- Carsten
On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Scot Becker wrote:
Dear all,
I'm a new org user who recently ran across the video of Carsten's
Goog
5. A final solution (which might also gain other advantages) could be
to begin to facilitate an org-export mode to Pandoc's native
plain-text syntax (an extension of Markdown).[7] Pandoc is a robust
Haskell engine to convert between plain text formats. This would add
a step to org-mode export,
Hi Scot,
thanks for your detailed and thoughtful post.
On second consideration, I really like the proposal Matt
made back then, and I even like more that there is already
code to do this conversion. A quick look at Paul's code
indicates that
(add-hook 'org-export-preprocess-hook
Dear all,
I'm a new org user who recently ran across the video of Carsten's
Google talk. I have been looking for something like org for years, but
learning Emacs had always seemed too high a price, so I never really
considered Emacs-based options. However time is a teacher, and I see
now that the
11 matches
Mail list logo
