> What is this "tree buffer" you speak of?
The tree buffer is a library from CEDET project, widely used in ECB. Look at
this screenshot, and you'll see tree buffers at the top of the frame:
http://ecb.sourceforge.net/screenshots/12.png
> Are you telling me that I can already use Org to view th
On May 11, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Jan Böcker wrote:
Ivanov Dmitry writes:
The tree buffer seems an ideal tool for this project.
What is this "tree buffer" you speak of?
Are you telling me that I can already use Org to view the outline
Leo-style, with the outline structure (folded to the "conten
> Ivanov Dmitry writes:
>
>> The tree buffer seems an ideal tool for this project.
What is this "tree buffer" you speak of?
Are you telling me that I can already use Org to view the outline
Leo-style, with the outline structure (folded to the "content" startup
visibility) in one window and an in
Hi Ivanov,
Are you familiar with Org-babel?
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/
It adds literate programming support to Org-mode.
Best -- Eric
Ivanov Dmitry writes:
> Hi.
> I have been using a literate programming tool: leo editor. Maybe someone
> used it. A programmer can create a
Hi.
I have been using a literate programming tool: leo editor. Maybe someone used
it. A programmer can create a tree with the description of the program with the
minuteness he wants. In each node he has a chunk of code and comments, if
needed.
Is anybody interested in creating an emacs mode, m
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> Thanks for the description. This is very interesting and I think
> warrants a re-working of the tangle functionality in org-babel.
>
> Given your description below I think I may try to add the Nuweb
> link/reference syntax "<>" to org-babel. As
> sourc
Hi Sébastien,
Thanks for the description. This is very interesting and I think
warrants a re-working of the tangle functionality in org-babel.
Given your description below I think I may try to add the Nuweb
link/reference syntax "<>" to org-babel. As
source-code blocks are already named in the
Hmm, this seems interesting and something I'm looking for, but I'm not
entirely sure what you mean by "literate programming" (I haven't
googled yet either, I'm about to do it once I answer this message).
Anyway, I have a project I'm working on right now that requires me to
set up a "publishing envi
Hi Eric and all,
Here some promised description of how I'm using Literate Programming with
LaTeX (up to now -- soon directly from Org mode?).
I write an "enhanced LaTeX" file ([1], having the `.nw' -- for Nuweb --
extension). It is enhanced as I can put blocks of code in there (SQL blocks,
for ex
Emre Sahin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [... Haskell literals ...]
>
> In Literate Haskell, program lines start with a >. If it's not used,
> than the line is considered as a comment line, hence making org-mode
> useful in folding, maintainin TODOs etc. (This message is already a
> Literate Hask
Hi all,
Do any of you use org-mode for literate programming? I think that
would be a very natural use of org-mode.
Support in other compilers may be minimal, but one can write a
Literate Haskell program in org-mode without any changes I
think. E.g. (a meaningless program from Haskell wikibook)
11 matches
Mail list logo
