Hi Andrew,
On 2009-07-09, Andrew M. Nuxoll nux...@up.edu wrote:
3. Once I set a deadline for a task, it'd be nice if the priority would
increase as the deadline approached. Ideally the criteria for
increasing the priority could be specified via a customizable formula.
Does this
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Andrew M. Nuxoll nux...@up.edu wrote:
3. Once I set a deadline for a task, it'd be nice if the priority
would
increase as the deadline approached. Ideally the criteria for
increasing the priority could be specified via a customizable
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
Nick Dokos wrote:
Just an FYI (a nice one since Carsten said so :-): Carsten is the first
name, Dominik (no c) is the surname of the creator of Org-mode. And I
promise we'll be nice even after he comes back :-)
Err, whoops!
So let me turn the question around: why do
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:31 -0700,
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
In my mind, there is no conflict between scheduling and deadlining.
I agree with you on this point but, in this case, it makes sense for
both aspects to be highlighted in the agenda view. I would suggest
that you might wish to change
Eric S Fraga ucec...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:31 -0700,
Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
In my mind, there is no conflict between scheduling and deadlining.
I agree with you on this point but, in this case, it makes sense for
both aspects to be highlighted in the agenda view. I
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Quite likely it's a failure of imagination on my part, but I still
don't see why you would both schedule and deadline an item. Could
you provide a scenario where that would be useful?
I think the OP has a time frame to execute some task. He doesn't
At Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:32:59 -0400,
Nick Dokos wrote:
Quite likely it's a failure of imagination on my part, but I still
don't see why you would both schedule and deadline an item. Could
you provide a scenario where that would be useful?
Well, to use an example that I think the OP (Andrew)
At Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:48:20 +0200,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
[...]
Then again, as someone said, a DEADLINE with an appropriate warning
delay would be fine in that case too.
I have tasks that have deadlines months in the future and which need
tackling from now until the deadline, although
Ok, newb here. I have only been using org-mode for a few days now. But
I've been an emacs guy since 1992, I have read the manual and I've also
searched the archive of this mailing list. So, forgive me if these
questions are repeats. Also, Dominick said you had to be nice to me
while he was
Andrew M. Nuxoll said unto the world at 09/07/09 04:37 PM:
2. Once a TODO item has been marked as DONE, it still shows up on my
agenda. Can this be avoided?
I have the following lines in my .emacs:
(setq org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-done t)
(setq org-agenda-skip-deadline-if-done t)
Best,
Nick Dokos wrote:
Just an FYI (a nice one since Carsten said so :-): Carsten is the first
name, Dominik (no c) is the surname of the creator of Org-mode. And I
promise we'll be nice even after he comes back :-)
Err, whoops!
So let me turn the question around: why do you need to both
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Stathis Sideris wrote:
[...]
(2) Is there any way to make org-cycle skip the show all mode? That
would make it to just collapse/expand the children of the current
heading.
If I understood you right then TAB should do that for you (instead of
12 matches
Mail list logo
