Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> I have one question, though. There are actions that you know you have
> to do, but that don't justify the creation of an outcome, or, in other
> words, creating a project for this NA would be overkill, such as "Buy
> chocolate :HOME:". What would be the outcome r
Thanks. Got it, I'm definitely not giving org agenda the importance it
deserves. Anyway, it might serve as an example of a simpler approach.
I have one question, though. There are actions that you know you have to do,
but that don't justify the creation of an outcome, or, in other words,
creating
Matt Lundin writes:
> Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
>
>> On the other hand, most of this could be achieved by using the agenda
>> view and other org filtering features, and still keep a list of
>> projects, sub-projects and next-actions, all in one, like:
>>
>> (Always ordered by priority)
>>
Marcelo de Moraes Serpa writes:
> On the other hand, most of this could be achieved by using the agenda
> view and other org filtering features, and still keep a list of
> projects, sub-projects and next-actions, all in one, like:
>
> (Always ordered by priority)
>
> * Projects and Next Actions
>
Another thing I'd like to add:
The only one next actions lists put the importance on actions, not on
projects. And isn't that what GTD is essentially about? Managing actions?
As long as you are acting up on your actions, that's fine, the need to check
the projects is not that frequent, in my opin
Thanks for the replies.
I can see the value of having project lists with its actions beneath (and
sub-projects), but I don't have the discipline or maybe not enough org
skills to use it efficiently.
Having one project list that *lists only projects* (outcomes that require
more than one action to
Manish writes:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> This is for the GTD orgers out there. I've taken the article written by
>> Charles as a basis for my GTD implementation. In the end, it's all about
>> what works for you, but I'd like to get som