Hi Matthias,
On 22 October 2010 05:27, Matthias Danzl wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 10:10 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
>> On 20 October 2010 20:40, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>> Given the mangling that mailers do to replies (e.g. the idiotic default
>>> top posting of Thunderbird and its ilk), how they handle signatu
On 10/21/2010 10:10 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On 20 October 2010 20:40, Nick Dokos wrote:
>> Given the mangling that mailers do to replies (e.g. the idiotic default
>> top posting of Thunderbird and its ilk), how they handle signatures, and
>> the non-standard nature of signatures themselves, I'd sa
Sébastien Vauban
writes:
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> date
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> is still good. for code.. ;-) and maybe supported in other emailers
> than Gnus?
I'm not sure, but `C-u C-c M-m' inserts ver
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos wrote:
> Jeff Horn wrote:
> I use boxquote.el (see http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BoxQuote) for the
> above style, but as Samuel and Bernt point out that's not the best way
> for quoting material where the recipient is expected to use the quoted
> material (e.g. code snippets)
Hi Nick,
On 20 October 2010 20:40, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Given the mangling that mailers do to replies (e.g. the idiotic default
> top posting of Thunderbird and its ilk), how they handle signatures, and
> the non-standard nature of signatures themselves, I'd say this is pretty
> much hopeless.
Af
Hi Tassilo,
On 21 October 2010 00:45, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> suvayu ali writes:
>
> Hi!
>
>> Also in my case, the footnotes appear below the signature. I have to
>> manually move it above that before sending the email. Would be awesome
>> if org-footnote-action understood signatures somehow.
>
>
suvayu ali writes:
Hi!
> Also in my case, the footnotes appear below the signature. I have to
> manually move it above that before sending the email. Would be awesome
> if org-footnote-action understood signatures somehow.
Hm, I don't use org-mode and its functions when writing mails using
Gnus
Matt Lundin writes:
> Jeff Horn writes:
>
>> Firstly, I notice some of the regular posters wrap org source in the
>> #+ style org wrappers, others use a <--8--cut-here---8-->
>
>> My first question is two-fold: 1) how did you come to use this style
>> for quoting code in your replies:
>
> As ot
suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 20 October 2010 18:55, Matt Lundin wrote:
> > I simply have a global binding for org-footnote-action, which enables me
> > to insert footnotes anywhere.[1]
> >
>
> I do that too, but it shows up as [fn:1] for me. Is there some
> variable I can customise to g
Hi Jeff,
On 20 October 2010 18:55, Matt Lundin wrote:
> I simply have a global binding for org-footnote-action, which enables me
> to insert footnotes anywhere.[1]
>
I do that too, but it shows up as [fn:1] for me. Is there some
variable I can customise to get it as [1] when I am using it outsid
Jeff Horn writes:
> Firstly, I notice some of the regular posters wrap org source in the
> #+ style org wrappers, others use a <--8--cut-here---8-->
> My first question is two-fold: 1) how did you come to use this style
> for quoting code in your replies:
As others have mentioned, I use C-c M-
Samuel Wales writes:
> On 2010-10-19, Jeff Horn wrote:
>> .
>> | like this
>> | or this
>> .__
>
> As it can be an obstacle for people who are new to Emacs to remove the
> rectangle,
> I do
>
> ===
> This
> ===
Gnus provides a function to
--8<---cut here---start
Jeff Horn writes:
> Dear orgsters,
>
> I've had a few nagging questions that I didn't think warranted too
> much discussion, but my curiosity has gotten the better of me this
> evening.
>
> Firstly, I notice some of the regular posters wrap org source in the
> #+ style org wrappers, others use a
Jeff Horn writes:
> Dear orgsters,
>
> I've had a few nagging questions that I didn't think warranted too
> much discussion, but my curiosity has gotten the better of me this
> evening.
>
> Firstly, I notice some of the regular posters wrap org source in the
> #+ style org wrappers, others use a
14 matches
Mail list logo
