Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-07 Thread Eric S Fraga
At Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:33:08 +0200, Daniel Clemente wrote: > > > > > To cater more to the OP's needs, consider using a special tag for such > > common tasks, like :COMMON: > > > > The create a special agenda view hat just shows this tag. > > > This is a very nice solution. I thought of the agen

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-06 Thread Bernt Hansen
Daniel Clemente writes: >> >> To cater more to the OP's needs, consider using a special tag for such >> common tasks, like :COMMON: >> >> The create a special agenda view hat just shows this tag. > > > This is a very nice solution. I thought of the agenda view as a way > to view your agenda, bu

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-06 Thread Daniel Clemente
> > To cater more to the OP's needs, consider using a special tag for such > common tasks, like :COMMON: > > The create a special agenda view hat just shows this tag. This is a very nice solution. I thought of the agenda view as a way to view your agenda, but now I see that it can actually serv

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-06 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Oct 6, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: Daniel Clemente writes: Just another off-topic but however related...: C-u C-c C-x C-i i What if C-u C-c C-x C-i could show, in addition to the recently clocked tasks, some fixed tasks from a user-defined list? The dialog would be: Com

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-06 Thread Bernt Hansen
Daniel Clemente writes: > Just another off-topic but however related...: > >> C-u C-c C-x C-i i >> > > What if C-u C-c C-x C-i could show, in addition to the recently > clocked tasks, some fixed tasks from a user-defined list? > The dialog would be: > > Common tasks: > [1] answer phone > [b

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-05 Thread Daniel Clemente
Just another off-topic but however related...: > C-u C-c C-x C-i i > What if C-u C-c C-x C-i could show, in addition to the recently clocked tasks, some fixed tasks from a user-defined list? The dialog would be: Common tasks: [1] answer phone [b] breakfast [p] procrastinate! [n] think abou

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-05 Thread Alan E. Davis
I've been watching this thread closely. At this point I want to jump in. I like the ideas that have been posted here so far, about a different way of organizing remember in org. I'm not completely certain, but it seems that part of what was asked for earlier is included in org-remember already,

[Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-05 Thread Daniel Clemente
Some idea about remember variations: > +1, can we keep/have: > - the templates, > - possibility to 'pick file/topic first then remember' Actually what I would find useful is a task dispatcher for Emacs: a way to go to common tasks with a few keys. For instance: C-c C-x C-g would open your c

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-02 Thread David Bremner
Jean-Marie Gaillourdet wrote: >At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:41:39 -0400, >Bernt Hansen wrote: >> C-u C-c C-x C-i i >Perhaps, it's worth considering shorter and easier to remember >keyboard shortcuts. It is actually not quite as bad is it sounds. - C-u is the generic "do it differently prefix" - C-c

[Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-02 Thread Bernt Hansen
Jean-Marie Gaillourdet writes: > Hi, > > At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:41:39 -0400, > Bernt Hansen wrote: >> C-u C-c C-x C-i i > > Perhaps, it's worth considering shorter and easier to remember > keyboard shortcuts. > >> Should clock in the interrupted task. Then I use org-clock-goto to get >> to it qu

[Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-02 Thread Jean-Marie Gaillourdet
Hi, At Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:41:39 -0400, Bernt Hansen wrote: > C-u C-c C-x C-i i Perhaps, it's worth considering shorter and easier to remember keyboard shortcuts. > Should clock in the interrupted task. Then I use org-clock-goto to get > to it quickly (which is bound to F11 for me) Does this w

[Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture

2009-10-01 Thread Bernt Hansen
Rainer Stengele writes: > Jean-Marie Gaillourdet schrieb: >> while we are discussing a new org-remember facility. I've been missing >> an option to clock the time I've taken to write down my remember note. >> E.g. I use remember to make a small protocoll of a telephone call or >> some discussion

Re: [Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-10-01 Thread Peter Frings
On 01 Oct 2009, at 11:14, Rainer Stengele wrote: Jean-Marie Gaillourdet schrieb: Hi, while we are discussing a new org-remember facility. I've been missing an option to clock the time I've taken to write down my remember note. E.g. I use remember to make a small protocoll of a telephone c

[Orgmode] Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)

2009-10-01 Thread Rainer Stengele
Jean-Marie Gaillourdet schrieb: Hi, while we are discussing a new org-remember facility. I've been missing an option to clock the time I've taken to write down my remember note. E.g. I use remember to make a small protocoll of a telephone call or some discussion with a colleague. It would help m