No trouble. And welcome to the list.
I'm not exactly sure what you meant by "mixed up with indirect
buffers" and "technically valid, but unimportant". So do post back if
you think there is still a significant bug.
Scot
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Cian OConnor wrote:
> How embarrassing. I
How embarrassing. I was getting mixed up with indirect buffers. So while
the bug report is technically valid, it seems fairly unimportant...
Did I mention what a great product this is..?
Cian OConnor wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a fairly recent build of Emacs 23 on windows (23.0.94.1),
and while fol
