Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-26 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 17:45, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 0:28, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:21 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED vs. CANCELLED).

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thank you very much, but this is a bit tricky, so maybe I should do this. I'd guess it would be better for you to do it. I had a look at what would be involved, and a working change would touch a lot more places in the file than I thought it would,

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: If you send me a complex patch, we need to get your papers with the FSF first, or I cannot install the fixes into Emacs. I already have the papers from David and Piotr, so if you plan to contribute code in the future, maybe we should go

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:21, Leo wrote: I feel this too complicated. First, I don't think it is complicated at all, try it out. I have already gotten used to it: C-S-right to select the right sequence initially. After that, everything works exactly as before. My description sounds

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-21 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I think this solution is much more general and workable. Lets see what other people have to say about it. All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED vs. CANCELLED). The current implementation works okay for that, though it's

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-21 Thread Eddward DeVilla
It looks like there might some more discussion here, but I'd like to chime in and say I kinda like what you have done with the multiple sequences. Of course, I'm not using some of the more advanced features such as logging state changes. For my simple use of TODO items, this is pretty nice.

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So I think this solution is much more general and workable. Lets see what other people have to say about it. All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED vs. CANCELLED). The

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-21 Thread Eddward DeVilla
On 3/21/07, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007-03-21, Carsten Dominik said: - You can now use multiple sets of TODO keywords in the same buffer. For example, you may put the following three lines into a file: #+SEQ_TODO: TODO DONE #+SEQ_TODO: REPORT BUG KNOWNCAUSE

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-21 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:21 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED vs. CANCELLED). The current implementation works okay for that,