Robert Goldman wrote:
Is this really true? In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
Thunderbird --- VM never had true IMAP support that could interact with folders
on the server. All it did was use the IMAP protocol to populate its local mail
directory. This isn't really full
On 31 Mar 2010, at 21:09, Gary wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:
although many people have been saying it is
intimidating, it is not.
Oh yes it is :)
I kind of agree. This brings up another question, related to the recent
discussion about making a 'ready to
Hi Peter,
peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
So, wouldn't it be good if org could send those nicely formatted
emails using their mail clients? 'M-x org-send-email' and woosh, there
it goes!
I agree this would be nice, however my initial reaction is that this
will be the sort of project which
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
it. [...]
On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
functionality exists.
My uneducated guess is that it will [...]
near
Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
it. [...]
On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
functionality exists.
I too am a non-programmer-type who loves emacs/org-mode. I second this
approach. I don't think it will ever be possible -- nor desirable -- to
create a pure out-of-the-box setup as in window's programs -- but this
approach would work well for those of us able to tinker and learn a
little but not
Manuel Hermenegildo herme at fi.upm.es writes:
I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
has supported IMAP for a very long time)
Is this really true? In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
Thunderbird --- VM never had true IMAP support that
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Manuel Hermenegildo herme at fi.upm.es writes:
I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
has supported IMAP for a very long time)
Is this really true? In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Thanks for the news. I'm looking forward to having a new look at VM, if
it works well with IMAP now.
Unfortunately, at least the documentation on the emacs wiki for how to
use IMAP is badly ambiguous. There's a paragraph on the distinction
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:
although many people have been saying it is
intimidating, it is not.
Oh yes it is :)
I fondly[1] remember spending *ages* trying to find out how to set the
citation line (you don't, you setq message-citation-line-function
Simon Brown simon at cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:
Hi all,
I currently use mutt as my email client but I'm looking for greater
emacs integration and better html support. Org mode supports at least
gnus, vm and wanderlust. Can anybody advise on the relative pros and
cons? My main
* Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've
tolerated
mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support. VM
has nice integration with w3m for HTML. IMHO don't start on gnus if you've
never used it.
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:
* Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a
discussion, but I feel compelled to say...
+1 for gnus!
Gnus has far and away the biggest user base, the best support, and is
the most actively developed (as far as I can tell VM -- which I used for
a couple of years-- is a dead
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:
* Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've
tolerated
mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support. VM
has nice integration with w3m for HTML.
I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
has supported IMAP for a very long time) and there are indeed people
working actively it. The old 7.19 version has indeed been frozen for a
long time, but I am using the latest versions out of the repo on
Launchpad and
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a
discussion, but I feel compelled to say...
+1 for gnus!
Hi Simon,
I use gnus, and received help from people on the list. Here's a small
contribution if you do get going with it:
The
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)
Thanks for the .gnus code. Actually, I do not use .gnus and place all
in .emacs but I do not think that matters.
I run Ubuntu Karmic + Gnu Emacs 23. Both updated
Anyway, now my summary buffer looks very
Henri-Paul Indiogine hindiog...@gmail.com writes:
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)
Thanks for the .gnus code. Actually, I do not use .gnus and place all
in .emacs but I do not think that matters.
I run Ubuntu Karmic + Gnu Emacs 23.
On 2010-03-30 18:34 +0100, Manuel Hermenegildo wrote:
I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
has supported IMAP for a very long time) and there are indeed people
working actively it. The old 7.19 version has indeed been frozen for a
long time, but I am using the
Hi,
wow, that looks really great, thanks :-)!
Do you know by chance if it's possible to link sent mails in threads?
I'm using Gmail and all my sent mail is in a folder called INBOX and
it would be really great if I could see my own messages in the
threads.
Geralt.
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:
Hi all,
I currently use mutt as my email client but I'm looking for greater
emacs integration and better html support. Org mode supports at least
gnus, vm and wanderlust. Can anybody advise on the relative pros and
cons? My main restriction
* Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
I've had a quick look at the gnus manual and it seems to
Simon Brown si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk writes:
* Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
This is pretty fanboi of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
24 matches
Mail list logo
