Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-25 Thread Alan E. Davis
Perfect, thank you, het again. This is *very* helpful. I think I can implement pause functions at some point, as well; and the same adjustment function will be possible. Perhaps a format variable for the output, like "ET: " as one might wish. I can get my head around these ideas. They won't be

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
Fixed, thanks. - Carsten On Nov 25, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Charles Sebold wrote: On 25 Nov 2008, Carsten Dominik wrote: I have added such a timer to Org-mode, if you get the latest git release, you can use it. I include a quick patch to what I just checked out, to fix an extra parenthesis: --

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-25 Thread Charles Sebold
On 25 Nov 2008, Carsten Dominik wrote: > I have added such a timer to Org-mode, if you get the latest git > release, you can use it. I include a quick patch to what I just checked out, to fix an extra parenthesis: -- Charles Sebold25th of November, 2008 GNU E

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Alan, I have added such a timer to Org-mode, if you get the latest git release, you can use it. Here is the documentation for it: New relative timer to support timed notes = Author: Carsten Dominik Date: 2008-11-25 12:

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-25 Thread Alan E. Davis
You may understand that I was already looking at the idea of converting integer times back and forth to/from hh:mm:ss. Your functions look extremely interesting. I am trying to write a function to start the clock at a specific point in time. This could be useful when restarting or continuing a

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Alan E. Davis wrote: Thank you for the reply. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Why would you want to turn off the clock? It is actually not running, only a starting time is recorded. Just "start" it again when you nee

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-24 Thread Alan E. Davis
Thank you for the reply. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Why would you want to turn off the clock? It is actually > not running, only a starting time is recorded. Just "start" > it again when you need a new clock. > Perfect! Thank you. > > > A fur

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Alan E. Davis wrote: I have looked at the list archives, and discovered some previous postings on a similar topic, about "elapsed time." Perhaps I can be more specific. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Alan E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been ta

[Orgmode] Re: Relative clocking [Further discussion and ideas by OP]

2008-11-23 Thread Alan E. Davis
I have looked at the list archives, and discovered some previous postings on a similar topic, about "elapsed time." Perhaps I can be more specific. On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Alan E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been taking notes on videos, and need a relative clock function,