[Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-28 Thread Samuel Wales
I'm not upset about anything. Just didn't want anybody to be confused. It seemed to me that you thought that what you were doing was related, that's all. On 2010-08-28, Jambunathan K wrote: > > Samuel > > Samuel> What you are doing is not related to the conversation > Samuel> manager. >

[Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-28 Thread Jambunathan K
Samuel Samuel> What you are doing is not related to the conversation Samuel> manager. I never claimed otherwise. My use-case was clearly laid out and my patches are consistent with the purpose stated in the original post. If your concern is that I shouldn't be hijacking the subject lin

[Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-28 Thread Samuel Wales
More clearly: 1) The conversation manager is basically superseded by the ID markers idea. That is, you can implement it trivially once ID markers are implemented. 2) What you are doing is not related to the conversation manager. On 2010-08-28, Samuel Wales wrote: > Hi K, > > Indeed, if that

[Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-28 Thread Samuel Wales
Hi K, Indeed, if that is what you want to do, you can do it without too much effort, I think. The conversation manager is a bit different, but similar. I have not looked at the conversation manager idea for some time. At the time I also wrote (and still have) more notes on it. If anybody is in

Re: [Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-28 Thread Jambunathan K
Carsten & Others >> In the context of the original post, is there a possible way to do >> this. >> >> 1. I mark a TODO entry in todo.org as done. >> >> 2. An org-id (say ID-TODO) gets created for the TODO entry if >> there is none yet. >> >> 3. The state tra

Re: [Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-18 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:31:05 +0530, Jambunathan K wrote: > > > In the context of the original post, is there a possible way to do this. > > 1. I mark a TODO entry in todo.org as done. > > 2. An org-id (say ID-TODO) gets created for the TODO entry if there is >none yet. > > 3. The state

[Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2010-08-18 Thread Jambunathan K
In the context of the original post, is there a possible way to do this. 1. I mark a TODO entry in todo.org as done. 2. An org-id (say ID-TODO) gets created for the TODO entry if there is none yet. 3. The state transition to DONE triggers a capture rule. The conversation is collected in

Re: [Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2008-12-09 Thread Samuel Wales
Hi Ross, A =conversation= is one interaction or note, so voice memos are good for entering in a conversation, if that is the right thing for what you need. So are scans and anything else. Currently you store links with org-add-transcription. My copy of org does not have that, but the conversati

[Orgmode] Re: feature request: a basic conversation manager

2008-11-29 Thread Ross Patterson
I've had this post flagged since it first appeared and I've been intending to read it and comment on it fully. Since I appear not to be getting around to it, I thought I'd make a brief post for now. I haven't read your proposal fully but I've implemented some code that might be relevant or a rela