Re: [Orgmode] Windmove keybindings pass-through

2010-12-20 Thread Leo Alekseyev
Thanks for the suggestion, but this is a non-solution. My preference would be to (a) in org-mode, move outline manipulation to e.g. C-arrows from S-arrows, and if that is too difficult, then (b) get rid of outline manipulation altogether. I use S-arrows in windmove orders of magnitude more often

Re: [Orgmode] Windmove keybindings pass-through

2010-12-20 Thread Leo Alekseyev
To answer my own question: here's how you avoid clobbering the windmove commands. This method should probably be added to the org manual section which discusses the (add-hook 'org-shiftup-final-hook 'windmove-up), etc commands. ;; don't clobber windmove bindings: code must be placed _before_ org

Re: [Orgmode] Windmove keybindings pass-through

2010-12-20 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com wrote: To answer my own question: here's how you avoid clobbering the windmove commands.  This method should probably be added to the org manual section which discusses the (add-hook 'org-shiftup-final-hook 'windmove-up), etc

[Orgmode] Windmove keybindings pass-through

2010-12-16 Thread Leo Alekseyev
As per the docs, I have (add-hook 'org-shiftup-final-hook 'windmove-up) and similar hooks set. That way, shift-arrow keys work as they do in windmove (that is, they switch between windows) _unless_ I am on an org heading. I would like to make that behavior universal -- I want to disable any sort

Re: [Orgmode] Windmove keybindings pass-through

2010-12-16 Thread suvayu ali
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com wrote: Optionally, it would be nice if I can map the shift-arrow functionality to something like M-arrows or C-arrows or C-M-arrows (whichever might be not taken / less useful).  However, getting rid of org-mode's stealing