Re: [Orgmode] suggestion for a fix to org-clock-in

2009-08-02 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, I think the dot after the abbreviated month should be considered a bug. What locales are doing this? Maybe send a bug report to Emacs? - Carsten On Jul 28, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, For some time zone reason, my time-stamps look like this [2009-07-28 mar.]. Notice

[Orgmode] suggestion for a fix to org-clock-in

2009-07-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, For some time zone reason, my time-stamps look like this [2009-07-28 mar.]. Notice the dot after the name of the day. This prevents the regexp inside org-clock-in to recognize it as a valid clock format as thus to resume any started clock. I suggest the following simple patch. From

Re: [Orgmode] suggestion for a fix to org-clock-in

2009-07-28 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@neuf.fr writes: For some time zone reason, my time-stamps look like this [2009-07-28 mar.]. Notice the dot after the name of the day. It's because Emacs recently changed the format for abbreviated days. If you could track when this change appeared, that'd be nice.