> It is already in the main branch, AFAIU. I assume you mean it should be
> back-ported to bugfix branch. If that's the case, I don't know. This is
> a new feature, and not a critical one: there are workarounds, as you
> found out.
Yes, sorry, I meant the bugfix branch.
> This should be
Hello,
Kaushal Modi writes:
> Can this commit[1] be merged into the main branch.
It is already in the main branch, AFAIU. I assume you mean it should be
back-ported to bugfix branch. If that's the case, I don't know. This is
a new feature, and not a critical one: there are workarounds, as you
Hello Nicolas,
> Since you are probably busy, I implemented this on your behalf. The new
> behaviour is in main branch. Thank you.
>
Can this commit[1] be merged into the main branch. Locally on my
machine, I use org built from main and something like this was working
fine:
#+cite_export: csl
Hello,
Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
> Quintus' example illustrates why I think my proposed patch is useful
> (or, rather, will be when corrected :-)), and why the order of research
> should be from most-specific to less-specific.
>
> If a finename is not absolute, search :
> 1. relatively
Am Freitag, dem 19. November 2021 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> I think a better order for a relative file name would be:
>
> 1. relatively to `org-cite-csl-styles-dir',
> 2. relatively to buffer's default directory,
> 3. failure.
>
> WDYT?
I would be fine with it.
-quintus
--
Dipl.-Jur. M.
Hello,
Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
> If a finename is not absolute, search :
> 1. relatively to the buffer's default directory
> 2. if 1. unsuccessfull, relatively to`org-cite-csl-styles-dir'
> 3. if 2. unsuccessfull, relatively to emacs' default directory
> (BTW :
Quintus' example illustrates why I think my proposed patch is useful
(or, rather, will be when corrected :-)), and why the order of research
should be from most-specific to less-specific.
If a finename is not absolute, search :
1. relatively to the buffer's default directory
2. if
On Thursday, 4 Nov 2021 at 18:36, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> I'm strongly opposed to 2.
>
> 1 seems fine.
I'm with Bruce on this. I would like to specify a directory for csl
style search that differs from the default directory for Emacs as a
whole. The latter is already getting rather cluttered
Am Donnerstag, dem 04. November 2021 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> I think there are two ways forward when a relative file name is used:
>
> 1. First check `org-cite-csl-styles-dir' and, if it is nil, expand
>against `default-directory';
>
> 2. Drop `org-cite-csl-styles-dir' and always expand
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:20 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I think there are two ways forward when a relative file name is used:
>
> 1. First check `org-cite-csl-styles-dir' and, if it is nil, expand
>against `default-directory';
>
> 2. Drop `org-cite-csl-styles-dir' and always expand against
>
Hello,
Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
> IMHO, `org-cite-csl-styles-dir' is deemed to be a more-or-less
> permanent setting (possibly in `.emacs'), whereas allowing a relative
> filename doesn't need any initial setup.
But your patch blocks any use for `org-cite-csl-styles-dir' (relative
file
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2021 à 17:19 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
>
> > This (minuscule) patch allows to pass a relative (to the buffer's
> > default directory) file name to denote the CSL style file.
>
> Thank you. However, I'm not sure to
Hello,
Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
> This (minuscule) patch allows to pass a relative (to the buffer's
> default directory) file name to denote the CSL style file.
Thank you. However, I'm not sure to understand the purpose of the patch.
> Rationale : this allows the use of "one-of" styles
This (minuscule) patch allows to pass a relative (to the buffer's
default directory) file name to denote the CSL style file.
Rationale : this allows the use of "one-of" styles for "one-of"
projects without overloading a defailt CSL style directory (which may
or may not exist on a given system :
14 matches
Mail list logo
